World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Public-benefit corporation

Article Id: WHEBN0003219525
Reproduction Date:

Title: Public-benefit corporation  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Pacific Southwest Railway Museum, PBC, California Ocean Science Trust, South Bay Historical Railroad Society, BACCHUS Network
Collection: Government, Public Benefit Corporations
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Public-benefit corporation

Public-benefit corporations are a specific type of corporation that allow for public benefit to be a charter purpose in addition to the traditional corporate goal of maximizing profit for shareholders.[1][2] Depending on the country they may also be known as crown corporations, statutory corporations, or government owned corporations having monopoly over a specific service or market.

A public authority is a type of public-benefit corporation that takes on a more bureaucratic role, such as the maintenance of public infrastructure, that often has broad powers to regulate or maintain public property. These agencies are also known in other countries as statutory authorities, statutory boards, government owned corporations, regulatory agency, QUANGO and independent government agency.

Authorities borrow from both regulated industries, such as broadcasting and transportation.

Corporations such as these are often found in common law jurisdictions such as the Commonwealth countries and the United States.


  • Origins 1
  • History 2
  • Incorporation and powers 3
  • Public-benefit corporations by location 4
    • United Kingdom 4.1
    • Canada 4.2
    • Russia 4.3
    • United States 4.4
      • California 4.4.1
      • Colorado 4.4.2
      • Delaware 4.4.3
      • Florida 4.4.4
      • Georgia 4.4.5
      • Illinois 4.4.6
      • Maine 4.4.7
      • Maryland 4.4.8
      • Massachusetts 4.4.9
      • Minnesota 4.4.10
      • Missouri 4.4.11
      • New Jersey 4.4.12
      • New Hampshire 4.4.13
      • New York 4.4.14
      • North Carolina 4.4.15
      • Oregon 4.4.16
      • Tennessee 4.4.17
      • Texas 4.4.18
      • Vermont 4.4.19
      • Washington 4.4.20
  • Other meanings 5
  • See also 6
  • References 7
  • External links 8


Although corporations are now typically associated with private business, historically corporations began as means to serve defined and limited public purposes. Corporation history has roots in primarily government subdivisions and religious institutions, where the institution itself is identifiable independently of its membership's mortality. For example, if the Pope dies, the Catholic Church continues to exist, just as it continues to exist as generations pass on and get replaced by new members.

Public-benefit corporations likely have their direct roots in mercantile capitalism. In the early days of European exploration and colonization, a government or monarch would sometimes grant a charter to an entity defining a legal body ("corporation") and make potentially risky investments. While certainly not public-benefit corporations by today's standards, entities such as the Massachusetts Bay Company, Hudson's Bay Company, and the Dutch East India Company arguably are examples prototypes of publicly chartered (in this case, crown-chartered) corporations successfully undertaking defined activities with the support of privately contributed investments.


The modern era of delegation of government authority to a chartered corporation is marked by the United Kingdom Port of London Authority, established 1908. According to the Port of London Acts The Authority is a public trust established to "administer, preserve and improve the Port of London." The goal was to create an entity that would be run self-sufficiently like a private company yet remain under the control of the government. The name Authority is derived from the founding act of Parliament which repeatedly stated that "Authority is hereby given...." The special status of this entity and the fact that it remained subject to administrative law was established by the UK courts in R v Port of London Authority: ex parte Kynoch [1919] 1 KB 176.

Incorporation and powers

Public-benefit corporations are generally governed by boards of directors, which are appointed, rather than elected, and, internally, reflect bureaucratic forms. The corporation is government-owned and performs a specific, narrow function for the public good.

Public-benefit corporations are most often created by statute. In many Commonwealth countries, public-benefit corporations continue to receive charters from the British monarchy. In the United States, they receive their charters usually from states, but possibly from the federal government.

Public authorities are usually created with a specific mandate, such as the construction of bridges, mass transit, etc. Unlike departments or ministries of the state, these corporations usually are enabled by statute to raise revenues through bond issues.

For more information, read below about individual jurisdictions.

Public-benefit corporations by location

United Kingdom

The first reference to public-benefit corporations in United Kingdom law is in the Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Act 2003, which established NHS Foundation Trusts as public-benefit corporations. Schedule 1 of the Act sets out the requirements for a public-benefit corporation which include a membership made up of individuals living in a specific area, employees of the corporation and service users, and a board of governors some of whom are elected by the members based on "constituencies" such as staff, users or public. British authorities have used other terms with similar functions to public-benefit corporations such as statutory authority, QUANGO and crown corporation.

Public-benefit corporations are distinguishable from public authorities in that the latter do not have a membership.

Examples of other bodies which have a similar role to, whilst not being formally called, public-benefit corporations include the BBC, which is incorporated by royal charter. Many universities have charters going back centuries, and so are also chartered corporations.


Via Rail in Canada is an independent crown corporation offering intercity passenger rail services in Canada. The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation is another example.

The Province of Ontario shares two international public-benefit corporations with the U.S. state of New York:


In Russia the law "On Noncommercial Organizations" describes the status state corporations. It is a special form of noncommercial

United States

The U.S. Constitution is silent about the Federal Government's creation of corporations; the power to define and create corporations (other than as agencies of the U.S. government) is mostly reserved to the individual states. The parastatals, which are for-profit, but may exercise unique powers, such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, have federal charters.

Private corporations were not common in the early United States, and were created by an act of a state legislature, typically for a public purpose, such as for the building and maintenance of a toll bridge or toll road or water utility. Today private corporations may be created by simply filing appropriate documents with the appropriate department of a State.

Federal government public benefit corporations are often Independent agencies of the United States government as form of Government-owned corporation. Examples of federal public-benefit corporations created, owned and operated by the U.S. government include Amtrak, the United States Postal Service and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Many public authorities in the United States are interstate compacts or local and regional entities spanning multiple municipalities on the county or state level.

Ello, a Facebook-like company, recently set itself up as a Public Benefit Company.[3] American Prison Data Systems also established itself as a Public Benefit Company to address the dire need for delivering educational content and maintaining family relationships for America’s prison population, a large segment of society essentially left out of the digital revolution of the last decade. Since the company is focused on improving people's lives/job prospects, and reducing recidivism (public benefits) they chose to structure their organization as a PBC.


California Corporation law designates three types of non-profit corporations — Religious Corporations (for example, a religious order might be incorporated as one of these), Mutual Benefit Corporations (a condominium association) and a Public Benefit Corporation (often things like hospitals or colleges). The assets of a public benefit corporation are irrevocably dedicated to its charitable purpose. (Generally beginning in California Corporation Code at §5100 —

Under California law a Public Benefit Corporation may be created by a public entity — as the two examples above suggest, but the definition in the California Codes is very specific.


The Colorado General Assembly in House Bill 13-1138[4] allows for Public Benefit Companies. Section 7-101-503(2), C.R.S., defines public benefit as "one or more positive effects or reduction of negative effects on one or more categories of persons, entities, communities, or interests other than shareholders in their capacities as shareholders, including effects of an artistic, charitable, cultural, economic, educational, environmental, literary, medical, religious, scientific, or technological nature."

Ello is an example of a Colorado company which operates under the PBC laws.


In July 2013, Governor Markell signed into law a new type of public benefit corporation, [3]

The General Corporation Law (Title 8, Chapter 1 of the Delaware Code) was recently amended by Senate Bill No. 47, effective August 1, 2013, adding a new subchapter XV, which authorizes the creation of Public Benefits Corporations. As defined in the GCL, a PBC is a for-profit corporation intended to produce a public benefit and operate in a responsible and sustainable manner. The PBC is to be managed in a manner that balances stockholders' pecuniary interests, the best interests of those materially affected by the corporation's conduct and the public benefit for which the PBC is formed.



  • Board of Trustees of the Georgia MilitaryCollege


The Bi-State Development Agency is a bi-state agency managing public transportation between southern Illinois and Missouri. It serves the St. Louis metropolitan area.

The Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) oversees funding and operation of public transit in the Illinois portion of the Chicago metropolitan area.

The Illinois State Toll Highway Authority


The Maine Constitution Article IV Part Third Section 14 prohibits the legislature from chartering corporations by special acts of legislation, providing for only two exceptions, one being for municipal purposes and the other if the object of the corporation cannot be achieved another way.

In 1976 Governor Longley invited the heads of industry to act as a task force on economic development. Resulting from that effort, the Maine Development Foundation Corporation and the Maine Capital Corporation were chartered by special acts of legislation.

The charter for the Maine Development Foundation declared central management of the economy to be an essential government function with these words:

"Legislative findings and intent: "There is a need to establish a new basis for a creative partnership of the private and public sectors ...but which does not compromise the public interest or the profit motive. The state's solitary burden to provide for development should lessen through involving the private sector in a leadership role....... The foundation shall exist as a not-for-profit corporation with a public purpose, and the exercise by the foundation of the powers conferred by this chapter shall be deemed and held to be an essential governmental function."

The words declaring that it is the state's solitary burden to provide for economic development seems intended to comply with the constitutional exception that the object of a corporation cannot be achieved another way but the use of public-private relationships suggests that economic development is achievable in another way, through the private sector.

Since then the legislature has profusely chartered economic development corporations to serve as "instrumentalities of the state" These corporations are said by the legislature to serve the public purpose of creating jobs although that claim that has never been verified. The "public benefit" corporations include, among others, The Financial Authority of Maine, The Department of Economic and Community Development, The Maine Technology Institute, and The Maine Venture Fund. The University of Maine, deemed to be a corporate instrumentality of the state in 1981 where state advanced manufacturing is maintained. Most of the charters for state economic development corporations provide intellectual property rights for the state, including the University of Maine corporation/, bringing into question the not-for profit intentions of many of the subsidiary corporations of the state corporate network. Also included are former military bases that have been transformed into municipal corporations serving as instrumentalities of the state and governed not by the inhabitants of the municipalities as provided for by the Maine Home Rule Amendment, but by state appointed boards. The two towns are given names of regional development agencies- The Midcoast Regional Redevelopment Authority and the Lorring Development Authority but the tax dollars received are invested within the geographical boundaries of the municipalities.

The primary function of the Maine state corporate (public benefit) network is to redistribute public money to private corporations and investors using tax incentives including refundable tax credits, which mean that if no taxes are owed, the public owes the investors a refund on their investment for the jobs that the corporation creates.

The charter for the Maine Capital Corporation declared that " it is appropriate to use the profit motive of private investors to achieve additional economic development in the State, - going on to say that "This can be accomplished by establishing an investment corporation to provide equity capital for Maine businesses and by establishing limited tax credits for investors in the corporation to encourage the formation and use of private capital for the critical public purpose of maintaining and strengthening the state's economy."

The 1977 charter did not say that the tax credits are refundable but that same year §5202-A. Small business investment companies exempt was codified into law. it says "Corporate small business investment companies, licensed under the United States Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, and commercially domiciled in Maine and doing business primarily in Maine, shall be exempt from taxation under this Part. [1977, c. 640, §2 (NEW).]. If the tax credits provided by the Maine Capital Corporation were not refundable, there would be no advantage in them given the provisions found in §5202-A.

Refundable tax credits have since expanded to up to 60% with the limits on the tax credits continually increased- all for the public benefit of creating jobs- an essential government function, as so deemed by Maine statutory law.

In the state of Maine, public-benefit corporations:

  • are designated as a public-benefit corporation by statute; or
  • are tax exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code; or
  • are organized for a public or charitable purpose and is required to distribute assets to a similar tax exempt organization upon dissolution; or
  • have elected to be a public-benefit corporation.


  • Maryland Transit Administration
  • Baltimore
    • Charles Village Community Benefits District Management Authority
    • Midtown Community Benefits District Management Authority
    • Laureate Education



The state of Minnesota has enacted a Public Benefit Corporation Act, effective January 2015. A Minnesota public benefit corporation is defined as an entity created under the state's business corporation statute, which "elects in its articles to pursue general public benefit...." "General public benefit," in turn, is defined as "a net material positive impact from the business and operations...on society, the environment, and the well-being of present and future generations."


See Bi-State Development Agency.

New Jersey

The New Jersey Turnpike Authority (NJTA) is a public-benefit corporation in New Jersey, created by the New Jersey Turnpike Authority Act of 1948.

The Delaware River and Bay Authority controls the Delaware Memorial Bridge between Delaware and New Jersey, and is a bi-state agency. The Delaware River Port Authority is a bi-state agency of New Jersey and Pennsylvania. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey is a bi-state agency shared with New York.

NJ Transit, formed in 1979 operates bus, light rail and passenger rail service in New Jersey and in neighboring states as well as funding and planning of bus and rail services and programs.

Although "Public Benefit Corporation" is not a statutorily defined term under State laws (New Jersey Statutes or the New Jersey Administrative Code), such corporations are among those included within the statutorily defined term "State Agency".

New Hampshire

New York

The widespread use of public authorities in the United States was pioneered in New York state by Robert Moses. New York likely has the most extensive number of public-benefit corporations in the country. The approval of the New York State Public Authorities Control Board is required in some cases when creating an authority. An authority may at times levy taxes and tolls; this means that they are not part of the usual state budgetary process, and gives them a certain independence. Their most admired ability by the New York State and local government, is to circumvent strict public debt limits in the New York State Constitution. Furthermore, they may make contracts; because of public authorities' corporate status, there is generally no remedy against the chartering State for the breach of such contracts.[5] On the other hand, as agents of the state, public authorities are not subject to many laws governing private corporations, and are not subject to municipal regulation. Employees of public authorities usually are not state employees, but are employees of the authority.[6] Public authorities can also often condemn property.[7]

Among the major public-benefit corporations in New York state are the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, a bistate authority; and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, which manages most of the public transportation in and around New York City.

North Carolina


Articles of incorporation may be filed listing the new entity as a Public Benefit company. Existing companies may be converted to Public Benefit. A checklist of requirements can be found at: Oregon Secretary of State, Public Benefit Corporation Page.


Tennessee is arguably the banner state for the Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA's) operations, which span a region extending into seven states (most of Tennessee and parts of six others), but the TVA is actually a federally owned public authority. The TVA has been key in aiding the region's economic development, most notably in the 1930s during the Great Depression.



Like Maine, the state of Vermont defines public-benefit corporations broadly. They include public-benefit corporations founded by the state and by private entities. The Vermont Economic Development Authority[4] is an example of a state-owned public-benefit corporation.


Other meanings

More broadly, a public-benefit corporation could be any corporation that exists for a charitable purpose, though these are generally called non-profit corporations if they are not founded by a government. Some jurisdictions (the U.S. State of Maine, for instance) might define a public-benefit corporation broadly. In California, public-benefit corporations are one of several types of non-profit corporations.

See also


  1. ^
  2. ^
  3. ^ Fox, Justin. "How the Market Ruined Twitter". Retrieved 3 November 2014. 
  4. ^
  5. ^ John Grace & Co. v. State University Constr. Fund, 44 N.Y.2d 84, 375 N.E.2d 377; 404 N.Y.S.2d 316 (1978).
  6. ^ Ciulla v. State, 191 Misc. 528; 77 N.Y.S.2d 545; (NY Court of Claims, 1948)
  7. ^ 87 NY Jur PUBLIC AUTHORITIES Section 1 et seq.

External links

  • Kevin R. Kosar, "Public Authorities and the Public Good," Metro Matter Newsletter, May-June 2004.
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.