Avro Rj

BAe 146 / Avro RJ
Buzz BAe 146-300
Role Airliner
Manufacturer British Aerospace
BAE Systems
Avro International
First flight 3 September 1981
Introduction May 1983
Status In service
Primary users CityJet
Swiss European Air Lines
Brussels Airlines
Produced 1978–2001
Number built 387 (Avro RJ: 166; BAe 146: 221)
Program cost £350,000,000[1]
Unit cost
146-200: £11,000,000 (1981)[2]

The British Aerospace 146 (also BAe 146) is a regional airliner that was manufactured in the United Kingdom by British Aerospace, later part of BAE Systems. Production ran from 1983 until 2002. Manufacture of an improved version known as the Avro RJ began in 1992. A further-improved version with new engines, the Avro RJX, was announced in 1997, but only two prototypes and one production aircraft were built before production ceased in 2001. With 387 aircraft produced, the Avro RJ/BAe 146 is the most successful British civil jet programme.[3]

The BAe 146/Avro RJ is a high-wing cantilever monoplane with a T-tail. It has four turbofan engines mounted on pylons underneath the wings, and has retractable tricycle landing gear. The aircraft has very quiet operation, and has been marketed under the name Whisperjet. It sees wide usage at small city-based airports. In its primary role it serves as a regional jet, short-haul airliner or regional airliner. The BAe 146/Avro RJ is in wide use among European airlines, such as Brussels Airlines, CityJet, Swiss International Air Lines and Lufthansa.

The BAe 146 comes in -100, -200 and -300 models. The equivalent Avro RJ versions are designated RJ70, RJ85, and RJ100. The freight-carrying version carries the designation "QT" (Quiet Trader), a convertible passenger-or-freight model is designated as "QC" (Quick Change). A "gravel kit" can be fitted to aircraft to enable operations from rough, unprepared airstrips.[4]



In August 1973, Hawker Siddeley launched a new 70 seat regional airliner project, the HS.146, to fill the gap between turboprop-powered airliners like the Hawker Siddeley HS.748 and the Fokker F.27 and small jet airliners like the BAC One-Eleven and Boeing 737.[5][6] The chosen configuration had a high wing and a T-tail to give good short-field performance, while the aircraft was to be powered by four Avco Lycoming ALF 502s turbofan engines. The programme was initially launched with backing from the UK Government, who agreed to contribute 50% of the development costs in return for a share of the revenues from each aircraft sold.[7] In October 1974, all work on the project was halted as a result of the world economic downturn resulting from the 1973 oil crisis.[8][9][10]

Low-key development proceeded, however, and in 1978 British Aerospace, Hawker Siddeley's corporate successor, re-launched the project. British Aerospace marketed the aircraft as a quiet, low-consumption turbofan aircraft would be effective at replacing the previous generation of turboprop-powered feeder aircraft.[6] The first order for the BAe 146 was placed by Líneas Aéreas Privadas Argentinas in June 1981. Prior to the first flight, British Aerospace had forecast that the smaller 146-100 would significantly outsell the 146-200 variant; however, airlines had showed a great level of interest in the larger 146-200.[2]

By 1981, a large assembly line had been completed as British Aerospace's Hatfield site,[2] and the first completed aircraft took flight that year, quickly followed by two more prototypes.[5][11] Initial flight results showed better than predicted take-off and climb performance.[11] In 1982, British Aerospace stated that the sale of a total 250 aircraft was necessary for the venture to break even.[11] The BAe 146 received its Certificate of Airworthiness on 8 February 1983.[12] Upon its launch into service, it was hailed as being "the world's quietest jetliner".[13]

Into production

Early production aircraft were built at Hatfield, which had originally been a de Havilland factory. The Avro RJ family of aircraft was assembled at the Avro International later BAE Systems Regional Aircraft Centre at Woodford Aerodrome in Greater Manchester, England. Production of various sections of the aircraft was carried out at different BAE plants. The rear fuselage section was manufactured at BAE Systems' former Avro site at Chadderton, near Oldham, Greater Manchester. The center fuselage section was manufactured at the Filton BAE site. The fin came from Brough and the engine pylons were made at Prestwick.[14] The nose section was manufactured at Hatfield, where the assembly line for the early aircraft was located. Some manufacturing was subcontracted outside the UK; the wings were made by Textron in the United States and the tailplane and control surfaces were made by Saab-Scania in Sweden.[15][16]

Due to the sales performance of the BAe 146, in early 1991 British Aerospace announced a development project to produce a new variant of the type, powered by two turbofan engines instead of four, that was offered to airlines as a regional jet aircraft. Dubbed the new regional aircraft (NRA), other proposed alterations from the BAe 146 included the adoption of a new enlarged wing and a lengthened fuselage.[17]

In 1993, the upgraded Avro RJ series superseded the BAe 146. Changes include the replacement of the original Lycoming ALF 502 turbofan engines by higher-thrust LF 507 turbofan engines, which were housed in redesigned nacelles. The Avro RJ series also featured a modernised cockpit with EFIS replacing the analogue ADI, HSI and engine instrumentation.[18] An arrangement between British Aerospace and Khazanah Nasional would have opened an Avro RJ production line in Malaysia, however this deal collapsed in 1997.[19]

In 2000, British Aerospace announced that it was to replace the Avro RJ series with a further improved Avro RJX series; plans to produce the Avro RJX were officially cancelled in November 2001.[19] Production of the Avro RJ ended with the final four aircraft being delivered in late 2003; a total of 173 Avro RJ aircraft were delivered between 1993 and 2003.[19]



British Aerospace promoted the BAe 146 to airlines as a "feederliner" and short-haul regional airliner.[2] The airframe of the aircraft and many other key areas were designed to be as simple as possible. The engines lack thrust reversers due to their perceived reduced effectiveness in anticipated conditions, instead the BAe 146 features two large airbrakes below the tail rudder at the rear of the fuselage, which has the advantage of being usable during flight and allows for steep descent rates if required.[20]

The aircraft proved to be useful on "high density" regional and short-haul routes. In economy class, the BAe 146 can either be configured in a standard five-abreast layout or a high-density 6-abreast layout, making it one of very few regional jets that can use a 6-abreast layout in economy class.[18] Reportedly, the aircraft is profitable on most routes with only marginally more than half the seats occupied.[6]

The BAe 146 is also renowned for its relatively quiet operation, a positive feature that appealed to those operators that wanted to provide services to noise-sensitive airports within cities.[18][21] The aircraft is one of only a few types that can be used on flights to London City Airport, which has a unique steep approach and a short runway; for several years the BAe 146 was the only conventional jet aircraft capable of flying from London City Airport.[22][23]


According to the BAe 146's chief designer, Bob Grigg, from the very start of the design process, making the aircraft as easy to maintain as possible and keeping operator's running costs as low as possible were considerably high priorities.[24] Grigg highlighted factors such as design simplicity, using off-the-shelf components where possible, and the internal use of firm cost targets and continuous monitoring. British Aerospace also adopted a system of cost guarantees between component suppliers and the operators of the BAe 146 in order to enforce stringent requirements.[25]

Drawing on experience from the Hawker Siddeley Trident and the Airbus A300, both the fuselage and wing were carefully designed for a reduced part count and complexity.[26] A high-mounted wing was adopted with an uninterrupted top surface; the BAe 146's wing did not make use of leading edge extensions, which also enabled a simplified fixed tailplane.[27] The undercarriage of the aircraft is toughened to resist damage and stabilisation is maximised by the placement of landing gear, of particular value when operating from rough airstrips.[1]

The BAe 146 was the second aircraft, after Concorde, to use carbon brakes.[1] The aircraft features a low amount of composite material, used in parts of the secondary structure only.[26] Initial production aircraft featured a conventional cockpit and manual flight controls.[20] At launch, the onboard auxiliary power unit (APU) consumed only half the fuel and only a third of the weight of contemporary models.[26]


The BAe 146 is powered by four Avco Lycoming ALF 502 turbofan engines, which are fixed on pylons underneath the aircraft's high wing.[5] The ALF 502 was derived from the Lycoming T55 turboshaft powerplant that powers the Chinook heavy transport helicopter. Notably, the ALF 502 had a very low level of operational noise, much lower than most other competing aircraft, this was achieved partly by the engine's high bypass ratio along with additional sound dampening layers built into the engine.[6]

Early on, the decision to adopt four engines for a feeder airliner rather than two has been viewed as atypical to some commentators. Advantages of adopting the four engine configuration includes greater redundancy and superior takeoff performance from short runways and in hot and high conditions.[5] Electrical power is primarily provided by generators located on each of the outboard engines.[18] For ease of maintainability and reduced operator costs, the ALF 502 is of a modular design and makes minimum use of specialist tooling.[28]

Multiple issues with the ALF 502 have been experienced. Internal electronics could overheat, triggering an automatic shutdown of an engine with no option of in-flight restart, and certain rare atmospheric conditions could cause a loss of engine thrust due to internal icing.[29] Additionally, the BAe 146 experienced aerotoxic syndrome due to leakage of tricresyl phosphate (TCP) into its bleed air; this has been blamed on problems with leaking engine seals. Exposure to these toxic fumes is a dangerous health risk.[30][31][32]

Operational history

In May 1983, British airline Dan-Air became the first carrier to launch services using on British Aerospace's new 146; the first revenue-earning service was flown between London Gatwick Airport and Berne Airport.[33] On 1 July 1984, the first of 20 BAe 146s ordered by Pacific Southwest Airlines was officially delivered.[34] Air Wisconsin was another major US operator of the 146, replacing their fleet of turbo-prop Fokker F27 Friendships with the type.[35] It was announced in January 1987 that the BAe 146 had been selected to launch the first jet services from London City Airport, it was chosen due to its unmatched flying characteristics to operate from so-called STOLports.[36]

The 146 was introduced into Royal Air Force service in 1986 as a VIP transport; it was the first jet aircraft to be operated by 32 (The Royal) Squadron.[37] According to Flight International, at least 25 executive aircraft have been produced for various customers, many of these had undergone conversions following airline operations.[38]

The type was widely used for passenger services in Australia from the late 1980s until the early 2000s, where the aircraft was suited to long distance, low volume routes. 18 were in service with Ansett Australia as of 1999.[39] The BAe 146 was also operated by East-West, taking delivery of 8 from 1990, until the company was absorbed into Ansett. Cobham Aviation Services Australia began operations under the Airlink brand on behalf of Australian Airlines (and later Qantas) in 1990 using the type until 2005. As of 2012, Cobham continue to operate 15 BAe 146 and Avro RJ variants for scheduled cargo and passenger charter operations, including the second production airframe, a -100 model converted to QT specification which first flew in January 1982 as part of the testing and certification program.[40]

The initial customer for the BAe RJ85 series was Crossair, who took delivery of their first aircraft on 23 April 1993.[19]

Several major cargo operators have operated the type. As of 2012, the BAe 146 QT is the most numerous aircraft in TNT Airways's air freighter fleet.[41] In 2012, it was announced that the RAF would acquire the BAe 146M as an interim transport aircraft between the retirement of the Lockheed C-130 Hercules and the introduction of the larger Airbus A400M Atlas.[37][42]


BAe 146-100, Avro RJ70 & BAe 146 Statesman

First flight of the -100 occurred on 3 September 1981, with deliveries commencing in 1983.[43] The launch customer in March 1983 was Dan-Air, soon followed by the RAF's Royal Flight. The -100 was the last of the 146 series designs to be developed into the Avro RJ standard with first deliveries of the Avro RJ70 in late 1993. The RJ70 differed from the 146-100 in having FADEC LF 507 engines and digital avionics. The RJ70 seats 70 passengers five abreast, 82 six abreast or 94 in high-density configuration. The Queen's Flight acquired a total of three 146s, all were fitted out with a luxurious bespoke interior. The aircraft are operated in a VIP configuration with a capacity of 19 passengers and 6 crew. The BAe 146-100QC is the convertible passenger/freight version and the BAe 146-100QT (Quiet Trader) is the freighter version.

BAe 146-200 and Avro RJ85

The 146-200 features a 2.41 m (7 ft 11 in) fuselage extension and reduced cost per seat mile. The -200 first flew in August 1982 and entered service six months later. The RJ85, the first RJ development of the BAe 146 family, features an improved cabin and the more efficient LF 507 engines. Deliveries of the RJ85 began in April 1993. The RJ85 seats up to 112 passengers. The BAe 146-200QC is the convertible passenger/freight version and the BAe 146-200QT (Quiet Trader) is the freighter version.

Two BAe 146-200QC aircraft have been converted to "C3" standard for the RAF, with infrared countermeasures systems and flare dispensers, for use in Afghanistan.[44]

BAe 146-300, Avro RJ100, and RJ115

Designers' initial proposals for the -300, the final development of the 146 product line, included a 3.2 m extension to the fuselage of the -200, more powerful engines and winglets. However, due to airlines requesting greater operating efficiencies rather than more capacity, the production 146-300 emerged as a 2.44 m stretch of the -200, without winglets or the proposed ALF 502R-7. Deliveries began in December 1988. The Avro version of the 146-300, the second such development of the 146 product line, became the RJ100. It shared the fuselage of the 146 version, but with interior, engine and avionics improvements. The most common configuration in the RJ100 seats 100 passengers. An RJ115 variant, the same physical size but with an increased MTOW and different emergency exits, was marketed but never entered production;[45][46] it sat 116 as standard or up to a maximum of 128 in a high-density layout. A modified BAe 146-301 is used as a Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements (FAAM). The BAe 146-300QC is the convertible passenger/freight version and the BAe 146-300QT (Quiet Trader) is the freighter version.

BAe 146STA

Throughout the production life of the BAe 146, British Aerospace proposed a number of specialised military versions, including side- and rear-loading transports, an airborne tanker version,[47] and a carrier onboard delivery version.[48] Out of these proposals the BAe 146STA (Sideloading Tactical Airlifter), based on the BAe 146QT cargo aircraft and sharing the same cargo door on the left side of the rear fuselage, was produced. This military transport version has a refuelling probe protruding from the nose; a demonstrator, fitted with a dummy refuelling probe and an air-openable paratroop door was displayed at the 1989 Paris Air Show and carried out extensive demonstration tours, but no orders resulted.[49]

BAe 146M

BAE Systems announced the BAe 146M programme in 2009, designed to provide ex-civilian BAe 146-200 and -300 aircraft to military operators, available either in either passenger or freighter configurations.[50] Upgrades and alterations made to the type include new glass cockpit avionics, additional fuel tanks, increased steep approach and unpaved runway operation capabilities, and being outfitted defensive aids, however a rear cargo door was not introduced. BAE has stated that the 146M is suitable for performing airlift, medical evacuation, paradrop, surveillance, or in-flight refuelling operations.[51]

Avro RJX series

The RJX-70, RJX-85 and RJX-100 variants represented advanced versions of the Avro RJ Series. The RJX series used Honeywell AS977 turbofans for greater efficiency (15% less fuel-burn, 17% increased range), quieter performance and 20% lower maintenance costs.[52] Bhutan carrier Drukair ordered two RJX-85s, while British European placed firm orders for 12 RJX-100s and 8 options.[53] However, BAE Systems terminated the project in December 2001, having completed and flown only three aircraft—a prototype each of the RJX-85 and RJX-100, and a production RJX-100 for British European. BAE reached an agreement with Druk Air and British European in early 2002 in which the airlines agreed not to enforce their firm orders for the RJX. BAE explored the possibility of manufacturing 14 "hybrid" aircraft, however British European at least was unwilling to accept the risk of operating a unique type.[54]

Firefighter conversions

Firefighting air tanker versions of both the BAe 146 and the Avro RJ85 have been manufactured via the conversion of aircraft previously operated by airlines.[55] Several organisations carry out such conversions, including under an arrangement between BAE Systems and US-based Minden Air.[56] In January 2012, Conair Group announced its arrangements to market and promote the Avro RJ85 as a major air tanker platform.[57] In October 2012, Air Spray Aviation of Alberta, Canada purchased its first BAe 146 for conversion into an air tanker.[55]

Preserved Aircraft

  • G-IRJX British Aerospace 146-RJX100 C/n E3378 Preserved near Manchester International Airport.[58]


Civilian operators

BAe 146

As of September 2012, a total of 87 BAE 146 aircraft (all variants) remain in airline service.[59] Major operators include:

  • Starbow Airlines (4)[61]
 New Zealand
  • SkyJet (1)
 United Kingdom
Avro RJ

As of September 2012, a total of 96 Avro RJ aircraft (all variants) also remain in airline service.[59] Major operators include:

 Faroe Islands
 South Africa
 United Kingdom

Military operators

Libya Libyan Republic
  • Free Libyan Air Force
 United Kingdom

Former military operators

 Saudi Arabia

Accidents and incidents

The BAe-146/Avro RJ has been involved in seven hull-loss accidents with a total of 259 fatalities.[65][66]

accidents and incidents

  • On 7 December 1987, a Pacific Southwest Airlines Flight 1771 BAe 146-200 (registration N350PS) crashed after a disgruntled former USAir employee aimed a .44 Magnum pistol and fired several shots in and near the cockpit area, causing the aircraft to enter a steep nosedive, and pick up speed to 770 mph (1,239 km/h). The aircraft slammed into a hillside, killing the 43 passengers and crew. At the time, airline employees were allowed to bypass security checkpoints.[67][68]
  • On 20 February 1991, a chartered LAN Chile BAe 146-200A (registration CC-CET) overran runway 8 while landing at Puerto Williams Airport (WPU), Chile, killing 20 of the 73 people on board.[69][70]
  • On 22 March 1992, an Ansett Airlines BAe 146-200A (registration VH-JJP) experienced a failure of all four engines (a condition known as an uncommanded rollback) and the electrical system at night while en route from Karratha to Perth, Western Australia at 31,000 feet in icing conditions. The aircraft landed safely at Meekatharra following restart of the engines at lower altitude.[71]
  • On 23 July 1993, a China Northwest Flight 2119 BAe 146-300 (registration B-2716) crashed while departing Yinchuan Airport (INC), People's Republic of China. 55 of the 113 passengers and crew were killed.[72]
  • On 25 September 1998, a PauknAir Flight 4101 BAe 146-100 (registration EC-GEO) crashed on approach to runway 15 at Melilla Airport (MLN/GEML), Spain, killing the 38 passengers and crew.[73]
  • On 24 November 2001, Crossair Flight 3597 Avro RJ-100 (registration HB-IXM) crashed while on a VOR/DME approach to runway 28 at Zürich-Kloten Airport (ZRH/LSZH), Switzerland. 24 of the 33 passengers and crew were killed.[74]
  • On 8 January 2003, Turkish Airlines Flight 634, an Avro RJ-100 (registration TC-THG) crashed while on a VOR/DME approach to runway 34 at Diyarbakir Airport (DIY/LTCC), Turkey. 75 of the 80 passengers and crew were killed.[75]
  • On 10 October 2006, an Atlantic Airways Flight 670 BAe 146-200A (registration OY-CRG) skidded off the runway while landing at Stord Airport, Norway. The spoilers did not deploy when the aircraft landed. Sixteen people were aboard; 3 passengers and 1 crew member were killed.[76][77]
  • On 13 February 2009, a BA CityFlyer Flight 8456 Avro RJ-100 (Registration G-BXAR) suffered a nosewheel collapse whilst landing at London City Airport. Four minor injuries were reported.[23][78]
  • On 9 April 2009, a BAe 146-300 belonging to Aviastar Mandiri, an Indonesian charter operator, crashed into Pike Mountain, Wamena and burst into flames killing all six crew after being ordered by the air traffic controller to abort the initial landing attempt.[79]
  • On 8 May 2013, Merpati Nusantara Airlines BAe 146-200 PK-JKC was destroyed on the ground by fire caused by an unloading accident at Wamena Airport, Indonesia.[80]

Specifications (BAe 146-200)

External video
Avro RJ-85 landing in high crosswinds at Dublin Airport

Data from Jane's All The World's Aircraft 1993–94[81]

General characteristics
  • Crew: 2 pilots
  • Capacity: 82–112 passengers
  • Length: 93 ft 10 in (28.60 m)
  • Wingspan: 86 ft 0 in (26.21 m)
  • Height: 28 ft 2 in (8.59 m)
  • Wing area: 832.0 ft² (77.30 m²)
  • Empty weight: 52,684 lb (23,897 kg)
  • Max. takeoff weight: 93,000 lb (42,184 kg)
  • Powerplant: 4 × Textron Lycoming ALF 502R-5 turbofans, 6,970 lbf (31.0 kN) each


  • Cruise speed: 498 mph (432 knots, 801 km/h) at 29,000 ft (8,840 m) (high speed cruise)
  • Range: 1,808 mi (1,570 nmi, 2,909 km)(Standard fuel)

See also

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration and era

Related lists




  • Ashford, Norman J., Saleh Mumayiz and Paul H. Wright. "Airport Engineering: Planning, Design and Development of 21st Century Airports." John Wiley & Sons, 2011. ISBN 1-1180-0529-5.
  • Hewish, Mark. "Britain's First New Airliner for 18 years." New Scientist, 94(1311), 24 June 1982. pp. 857–859.
  • Velupillai, David. "British Aerospace 146 Described." Flight International, 2 May 1981. pp. 1243–1253.

External links

  • Avro RJ
  • Falko Regional Aircraft - Largest 146 & Avro RJ asset manager
  • Smiliner 146 family information page
  • Avro RJX
  • THE BAE 146 at Greg Goebel's AIR VECTORS
  • Airliners net British Aerospace BAe 146

Template:BAE aircraft

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.