Charles Renouvier

Charles Renouvier
Born (1815-01-01)January 1, 1815
Montpellier
Died September 1, 1903(1903-09-01) (aged 88)
Prades, Pyrénées-Orientales[1]
Era 19th-century philosophy
Region Western Philosophy
School Continental Philosophy
Main interests Metaphysics
Notable ideas Néo-criticisme

Charles Bernard Renouvier (January 1, 1815 – September 1, 1903) was a French philosopher.

Biography

Charles B. Renouvier was born in Montpellier and educated in Paris at the École Polytechnique. He took an early interest in politics. Renouvier never held public office, spending his time writing, away from public scrutiny.

Thought

Renouvier was the first Frenchman after Nicolas Malebranche to formulate a complete idealistic system, and had a vast influence on the development of French thought. His system is based on Immanuel Kant's, as his chosen term "néo-criticisme" indicates; but it is a transformation rather than a continuation of Kantianism.

The two leading ideas are the dislike of the "unknowable" in all its forms, and a reliance on the validity of personal experience. The former accounts for Renouvier's acceptance of Kant's phenomenalism, combined with rejection of the thing-in-itself. It accounts, too, for his polemic on the one hand against a Substantial Soul, a Buddhistic Absolute, an Infinite Spiritual Substance; on the other hand against the no less mysterious material or dynamic substratum by which naturalistic Monism explains the world. He holds that nothing exists except presentations, which are not merely sensational, and have an objective aspect no less than a subjective. To explain the formal organization of our experience he adopts a modified version of the Kantian categories.

The insistence on the validity of personal experience leads Renouvier to a yet more important divergence from Kant in his treatment of volition. Liberty, he says, in a much wider sense than Kant, is man's fundamental characteristic. Human freedom acts in the phenomenal, not in an imaginary noumenal sphere. Belief is not intellectual merely, but is determined by an act of will affirming what we hold to be morally good.

In his religious views Renouvier makes a considerable approximation to Gottfried Leibniz. He holds that we are rationally justified in affirming human immortality and the existence of a finite God who is to be a constitutional ruler, but not a despot, over the souls of men. He nevertheless regards atheism as preferable to a belief in an infinite Deity.

Renouvier's dislike of the unknowable also led him to take up arms against the notion of an actual infinite. He believed that an infinite sum must be a name for something incomplete. If one begins to count, "one, two, three ..." there never comes a time when one is entitled to shout "infinity"! Infinity is a project, never a fact, in the neocritical view.

Renouvier became an important influence upon the thought of American psychologist and philosopher William James. James wrote that "but for the decisive impression made on me in the 1870s by his masterly advocacy of pluralism, I might never have got free from the monistic superstition under which I had grown up."

Works

  • Essais de critique générale (1854–64)
  • Science de la morale[2] (1869)
  • Uchronie (1876)
  • Comment je suis arrivé à cette conclusion (1885)
  • Esquisse d'une classification systématique des doctrines philosophiques (1885–86)
  • Philosophie analytique de l'histoire (1896–97)
  • Histoire et solution des problèmes métaphysiques (1901)
  • Victor Hugo: Le Poète (1893)
  • Victor Hugo: Le Philosophe (1900)
  • Les Dilemmes de la métaphysique pure[2] (1901)
  • Le Personnalisme (1903)
  • Critique de la doctrine de Kant[2] (1906)

Discilpe

  • Georges Rodier, French philosopher (1864-1913)

Further reading

  • Emmanuel Carrère: Le Détroit de Behring. P.O.L., Paris 1986.
  • Paul K. Alkon: Origins of Futuristic Fiction. University of Georgia Press, 1987.
  • Bernard J. Looks: How I Arrived At This Conclusion: A Philosophical Memoir. Translation to English of Renouvier's Comment je suis arrivé à cette conclusion. YBK Publishers, 2011.

Notes

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.