World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Cross-city route

Article Id: WHEBN0037466586
Reproduction Date:

Title: Cross-city route  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Trolleybuses in Bern, Public transport, Circle route, Radial route, Trolleybuses in Neuchâtel
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Cross-city route

Melbourne tram route 96 is a cross-city route connecting two very different suburbs, East Brunswick and St Kilda.
Ashland/63rd CTA station is a terminus of the Green Line, the only through route to run around the Loop on the Chicago 'L' rapid transit system.

A cross-city route is a public transport route linking one suburb (or satellite) of a city or town with another, usually relatively distant, suburb (or satellite).

Such a route can be operated by various forms of public transport, including commuter rail, rapid transit, trams (streetcars), trolleybuses, or motor buses.

Forms of cross-city routes

Through routes

Typically, a cross-city route will be a combination of two radial routes, each linking one of the outer termini with the city or town's central business district (CBD). Such a route is sometimes called a through route. (Note: The term cross-city route is not used in American English, and the similar American English term crosstown route has a distinctly different meaning, referring to a transport route that does not serve the city centre and runs generally perpendicular to radial routes.)

A public transport operator may combine radial routes into a through route because terminating a route in a city or town centre has certain disadvantages, including the following:[1]

  • Vehicles can cause congestion while standing between journeys and when turning.
  • Valuable land is often occupied with route terminal facilities.
  • Time is wasted by vehicles turning round or reversing (reducing vehicle utilization and increasing costs).
  • Passengers wishing to travel across the city or town centre will have to change vehicles or walk for part of their journeys. This always takes time, and often requires passengers to search for something (eg the correct departure stop). There can also be extra costs and hindrances flowing from these difficulties (especially for passengers with luggage or prams, the elderly, or the disabled), such as fear of loss of a connection due to delays.

On the other hand, there are certain advantages in terminating a route in a city or town centre:[1]

  • Schedules are less likely to be disrupted by congestion (since there can be provision for recovery time in the city center).
  • Convenient interchange between routes may be provided at a common terminal.
  • Fare structures are less complex.

In most cases, the advantages of operating routes across a city or town centre outweigh the disadvantages,[1][2] but each case must be assessed on its own merits.[1]

Other forms

Another form of cross-city route is a peripheral cross-city route, which links a pair of (usually distant) suburbs (or satellites) without passing through or close to the CBD.[2] Peripheral cross-city routes are called crosstown routes in American English.

Although a public transport route that links nearby suburbs without passing through the CBD would fall within this description, such a route will commonly be set up, and better described, as a feeder route to either a radial route or a through route heading towards the CBD.[1]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e "Route Planning". Urban Bus Toolkit.  
  2. ^ a b El-Hifnawi, M (2002). "Cross-town bus routes as a solution for decentralized travel: a cost-benefit analysis for Monterrey, Mexico.". Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 36 (2). Retrieved 27 October 2012. 
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.