World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article
 

Edwards v. South Carolina

Edwards v. South Carolina
Argued December 13, 1962
Decided February 25, 1963
Full case name Edwards, et al. v. South Carolina
Citations 372 U.S. 229 (more)
Prior history Certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina
Subsequent history 239 S. C. 339, 123 S. E. 2d 247, reversed.
Holding
State governments must protect First Amendment rights through the Fourteenth Amendment.
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Stewart, joined by Warren, Black, Douglas, Harlan, Brennan, White, Goldberg
Dissent Clark
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. I

Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229 (1963), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution forbade state government officials to force a crowd to disperse when they are otherwise legally marching in front of a state house.

Contents

  • Background 1
  • Opinion of the Court 2
    • Clark's dissent 2.1
  • See also 3
  • References 4
  • External links 5

Background

The 187 petitioners consisted of African-American high school and college students who peacefully assembled at the Zion Baptist Church in Columbia, South Carolina on March 2, 1961. The students marched in separate groups of roughly 15 to South Carolina State House grounds to peacefully express their grievances regarding civil rights of African-Americans. The crowd of petitioners did not engage in any violent conduct and did not threaten violence in any manner, nor did crowds gathering to witness the demonstration engage in any such behavior. Petitioners were told by police officials that they must disperse within 15 minutes or face arrest. The petitioners failed to disperse, opting to sing religious and patriotic songs instead. Petitioners were convicted of the common law crime of breach of the peace.[1]

Opinion of the Court

The Supreme Court held that in arresting, convicting and punishing the petitioners, South Carolina infringed on the petitioners’ rights of free speech, free assembly and freedom to petition for a redress of grievances. The Court stated that these rights are guaranteed by the First Amendment and protected by the Fourteenth Amendment from invasion by the States.

The Supreme Court argued the arrests and convictions of 187 marchers were an attempt by South Carolina to “make criminal the peaceful expression of unpopular views” where the marchers’ actions were an exercise of First Amendment rights “in their most pristine and classic form.” The Court described the common law crime of breach of the peace as “not susceptible of exact definition.”[2]

Clark's dissent

While the majority in Edwards distinguished Feiner v. New York (1951), based on the absence of violence or threats from the petitioners' march to the state capital, Justice Clark stated that the breach of the peace convictions upheld in Feiner presented "a situation no more dangerous than that found here." Justice Clark noted that Edwards was more dangerous because Feiner involved one person and was limited to a crowd of about 80, whereas the Edwards demonstration involved around 200 demonstrators and 300 onlookers. He argued that the City Manager's action may have averted a catastrophe because of the "almost spontaneous combustion in some Southern communities in such a situation."[3][4]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Edwards v. South Carolina - 372 U.S. 229 (1963)". Oyez: Chicago-Kent College of Law. Retrieved 15 January 2014. 
  2. ^ "Edwards v. South Carolina - 372 U.S. 229 (1963)". Justia: US Supreme Court Center. Retrieved 15 January 2014. 
  3. ^ Christmas, Gary. "Supreme Court Case: Edwards v. South Carolina, 1963". Howell & Christmas. 
  4. ^ "Edwards v. South Carolina". Cornell University Law School. 

External links

  • Text of Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229 (1963) is available from:  Findlaw  Justia 
  • Edwards v. South CarolinaFirst Amendment Library entry for
  • Summary of case from OYEZ
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.