World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article


Article Id: WHEBN0000232627
Reproduction Date:

Title: Gender-blind  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Political correctness, Gender studies, Pansexuality, Feminism, Gender
Collection: Feminism, Gender, Gender Equality, Gender Studies, Political Correctness
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia


A purple circle is a symbol for gender neutrality, derived from the two gender symbols' colours mixed together, and without the distinguishing cross or arrow used in the gender symbols (♂ and ♀).

A gender-blind (or unisex) person is someone who adheres to not distinguishing people by gender. Gender blind people generally advocate gender neutrality in society such as activities undertaken and services provided without regard to the gender of those who participate. Those who identify as pansexual may also refer to themselves as 'gender-blind': however pansexuality emphasizes gender blindness in sexuality.


  • Choice of words 1
  • The National Student Genderblind Campaign 2
  • Mixed-gender hospital rooms 3
  • Gender neutral public toilets 4
  • See also 5
  • References 6

Choice of words

Unisex is an older term, and a misnomer meaning "one sex". A more appropriate term would be bisex (which would mean two sexes). It should not be confused with bisexuality. Gender-blind however goes against most tenets of heteronormativity by not looking at gender at all.

The National Student Genderblind Campaign

In 2006 the National Student Genderblind Campaign[1] was created as a collaborative college students, administrators, and others throughout the United States. The NSGC advocates for the implementation of gender-inclusive dorm room and bathroom options.

Mixed-gender hospital rooms

The use of mixed-gender hospital rooms has proved controversial in both Great Britain and Canada.[2] Manitoba's Health Minister, Theresa Oswald, has campaigned actively against such rooms after receiving complaints from a Winnipeg patient, Ollie Ingram.[3] Oswald said if humanity can "put somebody on the moon," it can find a way to honor gender requests without leading to delays for patients.[3] At the same time, some medical ethicists have been critical of efforts to return to single-sex rooms.[3] Jacob Appel, an advocate for mixed rooms in the United States, has written that opposition to gender-mixed rooms stems from "old-fashioned prejudice" and argues that: "Because some people have been brought up to fear or dislike sharing a room with a person of the opposite sex, or blush at the prospect of catching a glimpse of an unwelcome body part when a robe slips open, we enshrine and perpetuate this prejudice in social policy.[4] Great Britain has agreed to phase out such rooms by 2010.[2]

Gender neutral public toilets

The end of sex segregation is closely linked to the gender blind perspective. This includes ending the sexism in discriminating gender exclusive facilities such as public toilets in some cases.

See also


  1. ^
  2. ^ a b John Miner, Shared room sparks rage,London Free Press, June 17, 2010
  3. ^ a b c Bruce Owen, Oswald vows action to stop coed rooms in hospitals, Winnipeg Free Press, May 14, 2010
  4. ^ Jacob Appel, Are We Ready for Coed Hospital Rooms? Huffington Post, June 18, 2010
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.