World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Gun control

Article Id: WHEBN0000044276
Reproduction Date:

Title: Gun control  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Gun culture in the United States, 3D printed firearms, Democracy and the Common Wealth, School shooting, Patrick Leahy
Collection: Firearms, Gun Politics
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Gun control

Gun control generally refers to laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms. They vary greatly around the world. Some countries, such as the United Kingdom, have very strict limits on gun possession while others, like the United States, have, compared to most industrial democracies, relatively few and weak restrictions (although policies vary from state to state).

Proponents of gun control generally argue the perceived dangers of widespread gun ownership. Opponents argue that gun control does not reduce gun-related injuries, murder, or suicide, and some argue that certain regulations may violate individual liberties.

Contents

  • Terminology and context 1
  • Global distribution of small arms 2
  • Regulation of civilian firearms 3
    • International and regional civilian firearm regulation 3.1
  • Studies, debate, and opinions 4
  • See also 5
  • Notes 6
  • References 7
  • Bibliography 8
  • External links 9

Terminology and context

Laws pertaining to gun control are a subset of a more general class of laws which deal with more general weapons, usually called arms control.[1][2]

In the context of this article, the concept of gun control is in reference to various means of a firearm restriction, use, transport, and possession. Specifically with regard to the class of weapons referred to as small arms. On a global scale this context is sometimes expanded to include light weapons; also known in the arms trade as SALW.[3]

From the perspective of military small arms, this encompasses: revolvers, pistols, submachine guns, carbines, assault rifles, battle rifles, multiple barrel firearms, sniper rifles, squad automatic weapons, light machine guns, and sometimes hand grenades, general-purpose machine guns, medium machine guns, and grenade launchers may be considered small arms or as support weapons, depending on the particular armed forces. Other groups utilizing these types of arms may also include non-military personnel such as law enforcement agencies.[4][5][6][7]

From a civilian (meaning via private, individual ownership) perspective and varying via legislation from country to country this encompasses a subset of the above list. Usually limited to: revolvers and self-loading pistols, rifles and carbines, assault rifles, sub-machine guns and light machine guns.[5]

Global distribution of small arms

It is estimated that there are in total 875 million small arms distributed amongst civilians, law enforcement agencies and armed forces, globally.[1][8] Of these firearms 650 million, or 75 per cent, are held by civilians worldwide.[8] U.S. civilians alone account for 270 million of this total.[8] A further 200 million are controlled by state military forces.[9] Law enforcement agencies have some 26 million small arms.[9] Non-state armed groups[2] have about 1.4 million firearms.[3][9] Finally, gang members hold between 2 and 10 million small arms.[9] Together, the small arms arsenals of non-state armed groups and gangs account for, at most, 1.4 per cent of the global total.[10]

Regulation of civilian firearms

Barring a few exceptions,[4] most countries in the world allow civilians to purchase firearms subject to certain restrictions.[13] A 2011 survey of 28 countries over five continents[5] found that a major distinction between different national regimes of firearm regulation is whether civilian gun ownership is seen as a right or a privilege.[16] The study concluded that both the United States and Yemen were distinct from the other countries surveyed in viewing firearm ownership as a basic right of civilians and in having more permissive regimes of civilian gun ownership.[16] In the remaining countries included in the sample, civilian firearm ownership is considered a privilege and the legislation governing possession of firearms is correspondingly more restrictive.[16]

International and regional civilian firearm regulation

At the international and regional level, diplomatic attention has tended to focus on the cross-border illegal trade in small arms as an area of particular concern rather than the regulation of civilian-held firearms.[17] During the mid-1990s, however, the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) adopted a series of resolutions relating to the civilian ownership of small arms.[17] These called for an exchange of data on national systems of firearm regulation and for the initiation of an international study of the issue.[17] In July 1997, ECOSOC issued a resolution that underlined the responsibility of UN member states to competently regulate civilian ownership of small arms and which urged them to ensure that their regulatory frameworks encompassed the following aspects: firearm safety and storage; penalties for the unlawful possession and misuse of firearms; a licensing system to prevent undesirable persons from owning firearms; exemption from criminal liability to promote the surrender by citizens of illegal, unsafe or unwanted guns; and, a record-keeping system to track civilian firearms.[17] In 1997, the UN published a study based on member state survey data titled the United Nations International Study on Firearm Regulation which was updated in 1999.[6][17] This study was meant to initiate the establishment of a database on civilian firearm regulations which would be run by the Centre for International Crime Prevention, located in Vienna. who were to report on national systems of civilian firearm regulation every two years.[17] These plans never reached fruition and further UN-led efforts to establish international norms for the regulation of civilian-held firearms were stymied.[18] Responding to pressure from the U.S. government,[7][20] any mention of the regulation of civilian ownership of small arms was removed from the draft proposals for the 2001 UN Programme of Action on Small Arms.[17]

Although the issue is no longer part of the UN policy debate, since 1991 there have been eight regional agreements involving 110 countries concerning aspects of civilian firearm possession.[17] The Bamako Declaration,[8] was adopted in Bamako, Mali, on 1 December 2000 by the representatives of the member states of the

  • Gun Control Australia - Supporting Gun Control in Australia
  • Coalition for Gun Control - Canada
  • Stop Gun Caravan - Japan
  • Gun Free South Africa
  • Coalition to Stop Gun Violence - U.S.
  • Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence - U.S.
  • Americans for Responsible Solutions - U.S.
National groups
  • Gun control at DMOZ
  • GunPolicy.org

External links

  • Alley, Roderic (2004). Internal Conflict and the International Community: Wars Without End?. Aldershot: Ashgate.  
  • Anonymous (1909). "Carrying Concealed Weapons". Virginia Law Register (Absorbed by  
  • Baker, J.; McPhedran, S. (2006). "Gun Laws and Sudden Death: Did the Australian Firearms Legislation of 1996 Make a Difference?". British Journal of Criminology 47 (3): 455.  
  • Beautrais, A. L.; Joyce, P. R.; Mulder, R. T. (1996). "Access to firearms and the risk of suicide: A case control study". Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 30 (6): 741–748.  
  • Branas, C. C. et al. (2009). "Investigating the Link Between Gun Possession and Gun Assault". American Journal of Public Health 99 (11): 2034–2040.  
  • Bukstein, O. G. et al. (1993). "Risk factors for completed suicide among adolescents with a lifetime history of substance abuse: A case-control study". Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 88 (6): 403–408.  
  • Bryant, M. S. (2012). Carter, G. L., ed. Germany, Gun Laws. Guns in American society : an encyclopedia of history, politics, culture, and the law. Volume 1 (Santa Barbara, Calif: ABC-CLIO). pp. 314–316.  
  • Bryant, M. S. (2012). Carter, G. L., ed. Holocaust Imagery and Gun Control. Guns in American society : an encyclopedia of history, politics, culture, and the law. Volume 1 (Santa Barbara, Calif: ABC-CLIO). pp. 411–414.  
  • Chapman, S. et al. (2006). "Australia's 1996 gun law reforms: Faster falls in firearm deaths, firearm suicides, and a decade without mass shootings". Injury Prevention 12 (6): 365–372.  
  • Conwell, Y. et al. (2002). "Access to Firearms and Risk for Suicide in Middle-Aged and Older Adults". The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 10 (4): 407–416.  
  • Dyer, Gwynne (2010). War: The New Edition. Random House.  
  • Hemenway, D. (2009). "How to find nothing". Journal of Public Health Policy 30 (3): 260–268.  
  • Hemenway, D.; Miller, M. (2000). "Firearm availability and homicide rates across 26 high-income countries". The Journal of trauma 49 (6): 985–988.  
  • Hepburn, L. M.; Hemenway, D. (2004). "Firearm availability and homicide: A review of the literature". Aggression and Violent Behavior 9 (4): 417.  
  • Juma, Monica Kathina, ed. (2006). Compendium of Key Documents Relating to Peace and Security in Africa. Series on peace and conflict in Africa. Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press.  
  • Karp, Aaron (2010). "Elusive Arsenals: Gang and Group Firearms". In Berman, Eric G. et al. Small Arms Survey 2010: Gangs, Groups, and Guns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  
  • Karp, Aaron (2007). "Completing the Count: Civilian Firearms". In Berman, Eric G. et al. Small Arms Survey 2007: Guns and the City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  
  • Kates, D. B. (1983). "Handgun Prohibition and the Original Meaning of the Second Amendment". Michigan Law Review 82 (2): 204–273.  
  • Kates, D. B.; Mauser, G. A. (2002). "Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide? A Review of International and Some Domestic Evidence". Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 30 (2): 649–694. 
  • Kellermann, A. L. et al. (1992). "Suicide in the Home in Relation to Gun Ownership". New England Journal of Medicine 327 (7): 467–472.  
  • Killias, Martin (1993), Del Frate, A. A. et al., ed., "Gun ownership, suicide and homicide: an international perspective", Understanding crime: experiences of crime and crime control (Rome:  
  • Killias, M.; Rindlisbacher, M. (2001). "Guns, violent crime, and suicide in 21 countries". Canadian Journal of Criminology 43 (4): 429–448. 
  • Kleck, G.; Patterson, E. B. (1993). "The impact of gun control and gun ownership levels on violence rates". Journal of Quantitative Criminology 9 (3): 249.  
  • Krug, E.; Powell, K. E.; Dahlberg, L. L. (1998). "Firearm-related deaths in the United States and 35 other high- and upper-middle-income countries". International Journal of Epidemiology 27 (2): 214–221.  
  •  
  • Lott, J. R. (2010). More guns, less crime understanding crime and gun-control laws (3rd. ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  
  • Lott, J. R. (2012). "What a Balancing Test Will Show for Right-to-Carry Laws". University of Maryland Law Review 71 (4): 1205–1218. 
  • Malcolm, Joyce (2002). Guns and violence : The English experience. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.  
  • Miller, M. (1978). "Geriatric Suicide: The Arizona Study". The Gerontologist 18 (5 Part 1): 488–495.  
  • Miller, M.; Azrael, D.; Hemenway, D. (2002). "Rates of Household Firearm Ownership and Homicide Across US Regions and States, 1988–1997". American Journal of Public Health 92 (12): 1988–1993.  
  • Miller, M.; Hemenway, D.; Azrael, D. (2007). "State-level homicide victimization rates in the US in relation to survey measures of household firearm ownership, 2001–2003". Social Science & Medicine 64 (3): 656.  
  • Miller, M.; Hemenway, D. (2008). "Guns and Suicide in the United States". New England Journal of Medicine 359 (10): 989–991.  
  • National Research Council (2005), Wellford, C. F.; Pepper, J. V.; Petrie, C. V., eds., Firearms and Violence: A Critical Review., Committee to Improve Research Information and Data on Firearms, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press,  
  • Ozanne-Smith, J. et al. (2004). "Firearm related deaths: The impact of regulatory reform". Injury Prevention 10 (5): 280–286.  
  • Parker, Sarah (2011). "Balancing Acts: Regulation of Civilian Firearm Possession". In Berman, Eric G. et al. Small Arms Survey 2011: States of Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  
  • Perrin, Noel (1980). Giving Up the Gun: Japan's Reversion to the Sword, 1543-1879. Shambhala.  
  • Reuter, Peter; Mouzos, Jenny (2003), Ludwig, J.; Cook, P. J., eds., "Australia: A Massive Buyback of Low-Risk Guns", Evaluating Gun Policy: Effects on Crime and Violence (Brookings Institution Press): 121–156,  
  • Tahmassebi, S. B. (1991). "Gun Control and Racism". George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal 2 (1): 67–100. Archived from the original on August 16, 2000. 
  •  

Bibliography

  1. ^ "Gun Control". Almanac of Policy Issues. http://www.policyalmanac.org. Retrieved 21 May 2012. 
  2. ^ James D. Agresti and Reid K. Smith (22 January 2012). "Gun Control Facts". Just Facts. Just Facts. Retrieved 21 May 2012. 
  3. ^ "International Instrument to Enable States to Identify and Trace, in a Timely and Reliable Manner, Illicit Small Arms and Light Weapon". unodc.org. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. February 25, 2013. Retrieved February 14, 2014. 
  4. ^ "General and Complete Disarmament: Small Arms". un.org. United Nations. August 27, 1997. Retrieved February 10, 2014. 
  5. ^ a b "Small Arms Survey: Definitions". smallarmssurvey.org. Small Arms Survey. April 15, 2013. Retrieved February 10, 2014. 
  6. ^ "DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms: Small arms". www.dtic.mil. U.S. Department of Defense. September 14, 2012. Retrieved February 13, 2014. 
  7. ^ "Inventory Management Asset and Transaction Reporting System". www.apd.army.mil. Army Publishing Directorate. September 3, 2009. Retrieved February 13, 2014. 
  8. ^ a b c d Karp 2007, p. 39.
  9. ^ a b c d Karp 2010, p. 102
  10. ^ a b Karp 2010, p. 101
  11. ^ Karp 2010, p. 121
  12. ^ Parker 2011, p. 62 n. 1
  13. ^ Parker 2011, p. 1
  14. ^ Parker 2011, p. 2
  15. ^ Parker 2011, p. 62 n. 4
  16. ^ a b c Parker 2011, p. 36
  17. ^ a b c d e f g h i Parker 2011, p. 3
  18. ^ Parker 2011, pp. 3-4
  19. ^ Alley 2004, p. 54
  20. ^ Alley 2004, pp. 53-54
  21. ^ a b Juma 2006, p. 39
  22. ^ Parker 2011, p. 4
  23. ^ National Research Council 2005.
  24. ^ National Research Council 2005, p. 3,6.
  25. ^ a b Branas 2009.
  26. ^ Krug, Powell & Dahlberg 1998.
  27. ^ National Research Council 2005, p. 2.
  28. ^ a b c Killias 1993.
  29. ^ Killias, van Kesteren & Rindlisbacher 2001.
  30. ^ "Homicide"
  31. ^ Hemenway & Miller 2000.
  32. ^ Miller, Azrael & Hemenway 2002.
  33. ^ Hepburn & Hemenway 2004.
  34. ^ Miller, Azrael & Hemenway 2007.
  35. ^ Clifton B. Parker "Right-to-carry gun laws linked to increase in violent crime, Stanford research shows" [1] Stanford Report November 14, 2014
  36. ^ John J. Donohue III, Abhay Aneja, and Alexandria Zhang, "The Impact of Right to Carry Laws and the NRC Report: Lessons for the Empirical Evaluation of Law and Policy" [2] May 20, 2010
  37. ^ Kates & Mauser 2002.
  38. ^ "Harvard Law School: Journals and Publications". Retrieved 14 January 2013. 
  39. ^ Malcolm 2002.
  40. ^ a b Lott 2010, p. 50-122.
  41. ^ Kleck & Patterson 1993.
  42. ^ Kellermann 1992.
  43. ^ Miller 1978.
  44. ^ Bukstein 1993.
  45. ^ Beautrais, Joyce & Mulder 1996.
  46. ^ Conwell 2002.
  47. ^ Lott 2012.

References

  1. ^ This figure excludes older, pre-automatic small arms from military and law enforcement stockpiles or 'craft-produced' civilian firearms.[8]
  2. ^ Composed of 'insurgents and militias, including dormant and state-related groups'.[10]
  3. ^ However, as of 2009, active non-state armed groups, numbering about 285,000 combatants, control only about 350,000 small arms.[11]
  4. ^ Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, and Taiwan (Republic of China) prohibit civilian ownership of firearms in almost all instances. Eritrea and Somalia also prohibit civilian possession of firearms as part of their implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms. In the Solomon Islands civilian firearm ownership is restricted to members of the Regional Assistance Mission.[12]
  5. ^ The survey, carried out by the Small Arms Survey included 28 countries (42 jurisdictions in total). The countries included in the sample were:
    • Africa: Egypt, Kenya, South Africa, Uganda;
    • Americas: Belize, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Dominican Republic, United States, Venezuela;
    • Asia: India, Israel, Japan, Kazakhstan, Singapore, Turkey, Yemen;
    • Europe: Croatia, Estonia, Finland, Lithuania, Russian Federation, Switzerland, United Kingdom;
    • Oceania: Australia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea.[14]

      The study states that 'while the sample is diverse and balanced, it may not be representative of the systems in place in countries outside the sample'.[15]

  6. ^ The impetus behind this study was twofold: firstly, there were concerns over the incidence of firearm-related crimes, accidents and suicides; secondly, there was the apprehension that existing regulatory instruments administering the ownership, storage and training in the use of firearms held by civilians might be inadequate.[17]
  7. ^ The US government was opposed to a section of the draft proposal calling on countries 'to seriously consider the prohibition of unrestricted trade and private ownership of small arms and light weapons'.[19]
  8. ^ The full title is 'The Bamako Declaration on an African Common Position on the Illicit Proliferation, Circulation and Trafficking of Small Arms and Light Weapons (2000)'.[21]
  9. ^ The present study, based on a sample of eighteen countries, confirms the results of previous work based on the 14 countries surveyed during the first International Crime Survey. Substantial correlations were found between gun ownership and gun-related as well as total suicide and homicide rates. Widespread gun ownership has not been found to reduce the likelihood of fatal events committed with other means. Thus, people do not turn to knives and other potentially lethal instruments less often when more guns are available, but more guns usually means more victims of suicide and homicide.[28]

Notes

See also

A comprehensive review of published studies of gun control, released in November 2004 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was unable to determine any statistically significant effect resulting from such laws, although the authors suggest that further study may provide more conclusive information. In 2010, Lott provides a comprehensive survey of research on concealed carry laws in the 3rd edition of More Guns, Less Crime. About 2/3rds of the peer-reviewed studies by economists and criminologists find that concealed handgun laws reduce violent crime and 1/3rd show no effect.[40] An updated review was published in the University of Maryland Law Review and it showed similar results.[47]

Economist John Lott, in his 1998 book More Guns, Less Crime, provides data showing that laws allowing law-abiding citizens to carry a gun legally in public may cause reductions in crime because potential criminals do not know who might be carrying a firearm. The data for Lott's analysis came from the FBI's crime statistics for all 3,054 U.S. counties.[40] Some have argued that gun ownership has no effect on violent crime. Kleck analyzed the impact of 18 major types of gun control laws on every major type of violent crime or violence (including suicide), and found that gun laws generally had no significant effect on violent crime rates or suicide rates.[41] Studies by Arthur Kellermann and Matthew Miller found that keeping a gun in the home was associated with an increased risk of suicide.[42] Other studies, however, found no association between gun ownership and suicide.[43][44][45][46]

However, a number of scholars have also reported that the rate of gun availability is associated with less gun violence. These include Don Kates, John Lott, Joyce Malcolm, Gary Mauser, David Mustard, and Gary Kleck. For example, a 2002 review of international gun control policies and gun ownership rates as these relate to crime rates by Kates and Mauser,[37] published in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy (a student run journal devoted to conservative and libertarian legal scholarship[38]) argues that, "International evidence and comparisons have long been offered as proof of the mantra that more guns mean more deaths and that fewer guns, therefore, mean fewer deaths. Unfortunately, such discussions are all too often been [sic] afflicted by misconceptions and factual error and focus on comparisons that are unrepresentative." Kates and Mauser point out in Europe, there is no correlation whatsoever between gun ownership rates and homicide rates (see table "European Gun Ownership and Murder Rates"). Joyce Malcolm reviewed the subject of crime rates and homicides in England[39] and found that, "data on firearms ownership by constabulary area" show "a negative correlation...[that is], where firearms are most dense violent crime rates are lowest, and where guns are least dense violent crime rates are highest."

A May 2010 Stanford study which examined US crime data through 2010 saw a correlation between right-to-carry gun laws and increases in crime rates, especially in the rate of aggravated assault. It is estimated that the passage of right-to-carry gun laws is correlated with an eight percent average increase in aggravated assault. When controlling for the effect of the crack cocaine epidemic, and increase in murder rates are correlated in states right-to-carry gun laws.[35][36]

The Harvard Injury Control Research Center, part of the Harvard School of Public Health, found that "The rate of gun homicide, and the total homicide rate was significantly correlated with levels of gun ownership", and that this also held across high-income nations and across states. The study also said that "Cross-sectional studies like ours do not provide information about causality." [30][31][32][33][34]

A number of studies have examined the

The first cross-national overall comparison of deaths caused by guns was published in 1998,[26] and found substantial variation. The possible factors leading to variation in gun violence among different countries was not assessed. A 2004 review by the National Research Council concluded that, "higher rates of household firearms ownership are associated with higher rates of gun suicide, that illegal diversions from legitimate commerce are important sources of crime guns and guns used in suicide, that firearms are used defensively many times per day, and that some types of targeted police interventions may effectively lower gun crime and violence."[27]

High rates of gun mortality and injury are often cited as a primary impetus for gun control policies.[23] The question of whether gun control policies increase, decrease or have no effect on rates of gun violence turns out to be a difficult question. While a variety of disparate data sources on rates of firearm-related injuries and deaths, firearms markets, and the relationships between rates of gun ownership and violence exist, found that while some strong conclusions are warranted from current research, the state of our knowledge is generally poor.[24] Despite the potential for improved research design, the National Research Council review concludes that the gaps in our knowledge on the efficacy of gun control policies are due primarily to inadequate data and not to weak research methods. The result of the scarcity of relevant data is that gun control is one of the most fraught topics in American politics[25] and scholars remain deadlocked on a variety of issues.[25]

Studies, debate, and opinions

[22] The provisions of this declaration recommend that the signatories would establish the illegal possession of small arms and light weapons as a criminal offence under national law in their respective countries.[21]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.