World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Habitual aspect

Article Id: WHEBN0031517321
Reproduction Date:

Title: Habitual aspect  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Grammatical aspect, Tense–aspect–mood, Media Lengua, Delimitative aspect, Miluk language
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Habitual aspect

In linguistics, the aspect of a verb is a grammatical category that defines the temporal flow (or lack thereof) in a given action, event, or state.[1][2] As its name suggests, the habitual aspect specifies an action as occurring habitually: the subject performs the action usually, ordinarily, or customarily. The habitual aspect is a type of imperfective aspect; the latter does not depict an event as a single entity viewed only as a whole, but instead specifies something about its internal temporal structure.

Dahl[2]:p.101 found that the habitual past, the most common tense context for the habitual, occurred in only seven of 60 languages sampled, including English. Especially in Turkic languages such as Azerbaijani and Turkish, he found [2]:p.111 that the habitual can occur in combination with the predictive mood.

Habituality in English

Standard English has two habitual aspectual forms in the past tense. One is illustrated by the sentence "I used to go there frequently". The "used to [infinitive]" construction always refers to the habitual aspect when the infinitive is a non-stative verb; in contrast, when "used to" is used with a stative verb, the aspect can be interpreted as stative (that is, it indicates an ongoing, unchanging state, as in "I used to know that"), although Comrie[1]:pp.98–99 classifies this too as habitual. "Used to ..." can be used without an indicator of temporal location in the past, or with a non-specific temporal indicator ("We used to do that", "We used to do that in 1974"); but Comrie[1]:p.98–99 states that the time indicator cannot be too specific, so that "We used to do that every Monday in 1974" is not grammatical.

The second way that habituality is expressed in the past is by using the auxiliary verb "would", as in "Last summer we would go there every day." This usage requires a lexical indication of when the action occurred; by itself the sentence "We would go there every day" is meaningless, while "We used to go there every day" is meaningful even though it does not specify when. As with "used to", "would" also has other uses in English that do not indicate habituality: in "In January 1986 I knew I would graduate in four months", it indicates the future viewed from a past perspective; in "I would go if I felt better", it indicates the conditional mood.

English can also indicate habituality in a time-unspecific way, referring generically to the past, present, and future, by using the auxiliary "will" as in "He will make that mistake all the time, won't he?". As with "used to" and "would", the auxiliary "will" has other uses as well: as an indicator of future time ("The sun will rise tomorrow at 6:14"), and as a modal verb indicating volition ("At this moment I will not tolerate dissent").

Habitual aspect is frequently expressed in unmarked form in English, as in "I walked to work every day for ten years", "I walk to work every day", and "I will walk to work every day after I get well".[1]:p.124

The habitual and progressive aspects can be combined in English, as in "He used to be playing."[1]:p. 30

Present tense

African American Vernacular English and Caribbean English use an invariant be to mark habitual or extended actions in the present tense.

Romance languages

The Romance languages such as French, Spanish, Italian, and Portuguese do not have a grammatical form that is specific to the habitual aspect. In the past tense they do have a form called the "imperfect", which combines the past tense with the imperfective aspect; this form is used to indicate that a past ongoing process was either habitual or continuous.

References

  1. ^ a b c d e Bernard Comrie, 1976. Aspect. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 25, 30, 98-99, 114-115, 124.
  2. ^ a b c Östen Dahl, 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Blackwell. Pp. 95, 99-101, 111.
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.