A continuous deformation between a coffee
mug and a donut (
torus) illustrating that they are homeomorphic. But there need not be a
continuous deformation for two spaces to be homeomorphic — only a continuous mapping with a continuous inverse.
In the mathematical field of topology, a homeomorphism or topological isomorphism or bi continuous function is a continuous function between topological spaces that has a continuous inverse function. Homeomorphisms are the isomorphisms in the category of topological spaces—that is, they are the mappings that preserve all the topological properties of a given space. Two spaces with a homeomorphism between them are called homeomorphic, and from a topological viewpoint they are the same. The word homeomorphism comes from the Greek words ὅμοιος (homoios) = similar and μορφή (morphē) = shape, form.
Roughly speaking, a topological space is a geometric object, and the homeomorphism is a continuous stretching and bending of the object into a new shape. Thus, a square and a circle are homeomorphic to each other, but a sphere and a torus are not. An oftenrepeated mathematical joke is that topologists can't tell their coffee cup from their donut,^{[1]} since a sufficiently pliable donut could be reshaped to the form of a coffee cup by creating a dimple and progressively enlarging it, while preserving the donut hole in a cup's handle.
Topology is the study of those properties of objects that do not change when homeomorphisms are applied. As Henri Poincaré famously said, mathematics is not the study of objects, but, instead, the relations (isomorphisms for instance) between them.^{[2]}
Definition
A function f: X → Y between two topological spaces (X, T_{X}) and (Y, T_{Y}) is called a homeomorphism if it has the following properties:
A function with these three properties is sometimes called bicontinuous. If such a function exists, we say X and Y are homeomorphic. A selfhomeomorphism is a homeomorphism of a topological space and itself. The homeomorphisms form an equivalence relation on the class (set theory) of all topological spaces. The resulting equivalence classes are called homeomorphism classes.
Examples
A
trefoil knot is homeomorphic to a circle, but not
isotopic. Continuous mappings are not always realizable as deformations. Here the knot has been thickened to make the image understandable.

The unit 2disc D^{2} and the unit square in R^{2} are homeomorphic.

The open interval (a, b) is homeomorphic to the real numbers R for any a < b. (In this case, a bicontinuous forward mapping is given by f = 1/(x − a) + 1/(x − b) while another such mapping is given by a scaled and translated version of the tan function).

The product space S^{1} × S^{1} and the twodimensional torus are homeomorphic.

Every uniform isomorphism and isometric isomorphism is a homeomorphism.

The 2sphere with a single point removed is homeomorphic to the set of all points in R^{2} (a 2dimensional plane).

Let A be a commutative ring with unity and let S be a multiplicative subset of A. Then Spec(A_{S}) is homeomorphic to {p ∈ Spec(A) : p ∩ S = ∅}.

R^{m} and R^{n} are not homeomorphic for m ≠ n.

The Euclidean real line is not homeomorphic to the unit circle as a subspace of R^{2} as the unit circle is compact as a subspace of Euclidean R^{2} but the real line is not compact.
Notes
The third requirement, that f ^{−1} be continuous, is essential. Consider for instance the function f: [0, 2π) → S^{1} (the unit circle in \mathbb{R}^2) defined by f(φ) = (cos(φ), sin(φ)). This function is bijective and continuous, but not a homeomorphism (S^{1} is compact but [0, 2π) is not). The function f ^{−1} is not continuous at the point (1, 0), because although f ^{−1} maps (1, 0) to 0, any neighbourhood of this point also includes points that the function maps close to 1, but the points it maps to numbers in between lie outside the neighbourhood.^{[3]}
Homeomorphisms are the isomorphisms in the category of topological spaces. As such, the composition of two homeomorphisms is again a homeomorphism, and the set of all selfhomeomorphisms X → X forms a group, called the homeomorphism group of X, often denoted Homeo(X); this group can be given a topology, such as the compactopen topology, making it a topological group.
For some purposes, the homeomorphism group happens to be too big, but by means of the isotopy relation, one can reduce this group to the mapping class group.
Similarly, as usual in category theory, given two spaces that are homeomorphic, the space of homeomorphisms between them, Homeo(X, Y), is a torsor for the homeomorphism groups Homeo(X) and Homeo(Y), and given a specific homeomorphism between X and Y, all three sets are identified.
Properties
Informal discussion
The intuitive criterion of stretching, bending, cutting and gluing back together takes a certain amount of practice to apply correctly—it may not be obvious from the description above that deforming a line segment to a point is impermissible, for instance. It is thus important to realize that it is the formal definition given above that counts.
This characterization of a homeomorphism often leads to confusion with the concept of homotopy, which is actually defined as a continuous deformation, but from one function to another, rather than one space to another. In the case of a homeomorphism, envisioning a continuous deformation is a mental tool for keeping track of which points on space X correspond to which points on Y—one just follows them as X deforms. In the case of homotopy, the continuous deformation from one map to the other is of the essence, and it is also less restrictive, since none of the maps involved need to be onetoone or onto. Homotopy does lead to a relation on spaces: homotopy equivalence.
There is a name for the kind of deformation involved in visualizing a homeomorphism. It is (except when cutting and regluing are required) an isotopy between the identity map on X and the homeomorphism from X to Y.
See also
References

^ Hubbard, John H.; West, Beverly H. (1995). Differential Equations: A Dynamical Systems Approach. Part II: HigherDimensional Systems. Texts in Applied Mathematics 18. Springer. p. 204.

^

^ Väisälä, Jussi: Topologia I, Limes RY 1999, p. 63. ISBN 9517451849.
External links
This article was sourced from Creative Commons AttributionShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, EGovernment Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a nonprofit organization.