World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Internet in the Netherlands

Article Id: WHEBN0012837148
Reproduction Date:

Title: Internet in the Netherlands  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Internet in the Netherlands, Internet in Europe, ChuvashTet, TatNet, Internet in Malta
Collection: Internet by Country, Internet in the Netherlands
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Internet in the Netherlands

According to research done by the Netherlands is ranked with Switzerland in having the most broadband subscriptions per 100 inhabitants,[1] has no bandwidth caps,[2] and has the most homes passed in Europe in terms of connection speeds of 50 Mbit/s and higher.[3]

Contents

  • Broadband Internet access 1
  • Internet censorship 2
    • Child pornography 2.1
    • Copyright infringement 2.2
  • Network neutrality 3
  • Data retention 4
  • See also 5
  • References 6

Broadband Internet access

Cable is the most popular form of Internet access with 41% of total subscriptions, followed by various forms of DSL and Fiber to the Home according to statistics from the end of 2010 gathered by the association of Dutch cable providers.[4]

Fiber-optic Internet access is rolled out on regional scale, encompassing part of a province or a municipality.[5] Deployment is comparable to local-loop unbundling: one party invests in the physical network on which other parties can provide their services.[6][7] At the end of 2010, fiber-optic Internet was available in 205 out of 408 municipalities. The number of homes passed was 714,600 from a total of 7.386 million.[8][9]

Internet censorship

Government-mandated Internet censorship is nonexistent due to the house of representatives speaking out against filtering on multiple occasions, although there have been proposals to filter child pornography and the Netherlands, like many countries, is grappling with how to prevent or control copyright infringement on the Internet. Internet filtering in the Netherlands is not classified by the OpenNet Initiative (ONI).

Child pornography

In 2008 Ernst Hirsch Ballin, then Minister of Justice, proposed a plan to regulate the blocking of websites known to contain child pornography. A blacklist would have been composed by the Meldpunt ter bestrijding van Kinderpornografie op Internet (hotline combating child pornography on the Internet)[10] and used by Internet service providers to redirect the websites to a stop page. The blacklist would contain websites hosted in nations where the Dutch authorities had no means of tracking and prosecution. Situations such as the blocking of WorldHeritage would have been avoided, according to the working group behind the filter.[11]

Under the proposal, stop pages were to be hosted by individual providers, an example being UPC Netherlands.[12] The pages would not log traffic since they were not being used as a tracking mechanism; rather, their use would be for private parties to contribute to combating the spreading of child pornography. This plan never gained traction and was only backed by UPC and an orthodox Protestant provider of filtered internet services, Kliksafe.[13] Providers would not be forced to use it since that would be unconstitutional according to a research done by the governmental Scientific Research and Documentation Center (WODC) commissioned by the Ministry of Security and Justice.[14][15]

In 2010 a report was released by the Werkgroep Blokkeren Kinderporno (working group for blocking child pornography).[16] It compared the filter in its last form with information from the Internet Watch Foundation. While they had "much wider criteria", the number of websites on the block list went from 2000 in previous years to less than 400 in 2010. The report stated that in the Dutch situation this would mean an "almost complete lack of websites to block" because the sharing of the material was no longer done by conventional websites, but by other services. In 2011 the plan was pulled by Ivo Opstelten for this reason.[17] The House of Representatives reaffirmed this by voting against the filter later that year, effectively killing any plans for government censorship.[18]

Copyright infringement

In January 2012, the

  1. ^ "Page not found". oecd.org. 
  2. ^ Prevalence of explicit bit/data caps among surveyed offers, by technology (Sept. 2010)
  3. ^ "Netherlands still top in Europe with most homes passed by 50+Mbps". telecompaper.com. 
  4. ^ http://nlkabel.nl/nl/Home/Cijfers-en-feiten/Internet.aspx
  5. ^ OnsBrabantNet. "De pagina is helaas niet beschikbaar - OnsBrabantNet". onsbrabantnet.nl. 
  6. ^ "Over Reggefiber - Over Reggefiber.". Reggefiber. 
  7. ^ http://www.glashart.nl/content/2-over-glashart
  8. ^ "Groei van FTTH is in 2010 vertraagd; komt uit op 14% in 2015". telecompaper.com. 
  9. ^ "CBS StatLine - Bevolking; kerncijfers". cbs.nl. 
  10. ^ "The Dutch Hotline", Hotline combating Child Pornography on the Internet
  11. ^ (Dutch) Workgroup for blocking child pornography (English translation)
  12. ^ http://212.142.48.139/english.php
  13. ^ (Dutch) (Click Safe and UPC have actually proceeded to block)"UPC en Kliksafe zijn daadwerkelijk overgegaan tot blokkeren", Adoption of the budget statement of the Ministry of Justice (VI) for the year 2008, Verheid.nl: The guide to all government information and services
  14. ^ (Dutch) "KLPD: Child pornography filter inept and unconstitutional" (English translation), Andreas Udo de Haes, WebWereld (IDG Netherlands), 16 September 2008
  15. ^ "Filtering and blocking of child pornographic material on the Internet: Technical and legal possibilities in the Netherlands and other countries", Stol, W. Ph., Kaspersen, H.W.K., Kerstens, J., Leukfeldt, E.R., Lodder, A.R., WODC, Research and Documentation Centre, Ministry of Security and Justice
  16. ^ (Dutch) "Progress blocking child pornography", Working group for blocking child pornography, 18 November 2010
  17. ^ (Dutch) "Dutch internet filtering off track" (English translation), Rene Schoemaker, WebWereld (IDG Netherlands), 7 March 2011
  18. ^ (Dutch) "Politiek zegt 'nee' tegen internetfilter" ("Politics says no to internet filter") (English translation), Joost Schellevis, Tweakers.net, 18 May 2011
  19. ^ (Dutch) Ziggo en XS4ALL moeten toegang The Pirate Bay blokkeren" (Ziggo and XS4all required to block The Pirate Bay) (English translation), NU.nl, Netherlands Sanoma media group, 11 January 2012
  20. ^ (Dutch) "Brein speelt voor eigen rechter" (BREIN plays for itself) (English translation), NU.nl, Netherlands Sanoma media group, 24 January 2012
  21. ^ (Dutch) "The Pirate Bay noemt Brein corrupte organisatie" (Pirate Bay calls BREIN a corrupt organization) (English translation), NU.nl, Netherlands Sanoma media group, 12 January 2012
  22. ^ (Dutch) "Kamer eist opheldering over Pirate Bay-blokkades" (House requires explanation about Priate Bay blockades) (English translation), NU.nl, Netherlands Sanoma media group, 18 January 2012
  23. ^ (Dutch) "Ook andere providers moeten The Pirate Bay blokkeren" (English translation: "Other providers must block The Pirate Bay"), Joost Schellevis, Tweakers.net, 10 May 2012
  24. ^ (Dutch) "Ziggo en Xs4all hoeven The Pirate Bay niet langer te blokkeren", Joost Schellevis, Tweakers.net, 28 January 2014
  25. ^ (Dutch) "BREIN stelt cassatie in bij de Hoge Raad tegen de afwijzing van blokkering The Pirate Bay", BREIN website, 21 February 2014
  26. ^ (Dutch) "UPC heft blokkade The Pirate Bay op", Joost Schellevis, Tweakers.net, 19 February 2014
  27. ^ "Documents and publications - Ministry of Economic Affairs - Government.nl". minlnv.nl. 
  28. ^ "Frequentiebeleid; Motie; Motie Braakhuis c.s. over netneutraliteit". Zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl. Retrieved 23 June 2011. 
  29. ^ "Nieuwe Telecomwet aangenomen door Eerste Kamer". NRC Handelsblad. Retrieved 8 May 2012. 
  30. ^ (Dutch) "Netneutraliteit opgenomen in Telecomwet" (Net neutrality included in new Telecommunications Act) (English translation), NU.nl, Sanoma Media Netherlands Group, 22 June 2011
  31. ^ "Wijziging van de Telecommunicatiewet in verband met de aanpassing van de bewaartermijn voor telecommunicatiegegevens met betrekking tot internettoegang, e-mail over het internet en internettelefonie; Amendement; Amendement van het lid Gesthuizen c.s. ter vervanging van nr. 9 over het terugbrengen van de bewaartermijn voor gegevens in verband met telefonie over een vast of mobiel netwerk tot zes maanden". officielebekendmakingen.nl. 
  32. ^ "Wijziging van de Telecommunicatiewet in verband met de aanpassing van de bewaartermijn voor telecommunicatiegegevens met betrekking tot internettoegang, e-mail over het internet en internettelefonie; Voorstel van wet". officielebekendmakingen.nl. 

References

See also

In accordance with European Union directive 2006/24/EC providers have to store information about internet traffic. While in the original implementation the duration was set to twelve months this was changed to six months due to questionable usefulness and necessity.[31][32]

Data retention

In June 2011 the Dutch House of Representatives voted for network neutrality enforced by law.[27] The revised Telecommunicatiewet ("Telecommunications Act") was formally ratified by the Senate in May 2012.[28][29] Among other things the law prohibits the blocking of Internet content.[30]

Network neutrality

[26] A month later, UPC unblocked access to the site following an agreement with BREIN.[25], the highest court in the Netherlands, arguing that the ruling is in violation of European law.Hoge Raad BREIN has since moved to an appeal with the [24] However, in January 2014, a court overturned the initial verdict and ruled that Ziggo and XS4ALL no longer have to block The Pirate Bay.[23] were also required to block The Pirate Bay.Tele2, and T-Mobile, UPC, KPN In May 2012, the Internet providers [22] while the government is mostly concerned about freedom of speech and privacy.[21]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.