World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath

Article Id: WHEBN0001400723
Reproduction Date:

Title: Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Mosess Fishman, United States Supreme Court cases of the Vinson Court, Segraves v. California, Censorship of student media, Dickinson v. United States
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath

Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath
Argued October 11, 1950
Decided April 30, 1951
Full case name Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. James Howard McGrath, Attorney General, et al.
Citations 341 U.S. 123 (more)
Holding
The judgments are reversed and the cases are remanded to the District Court with instructions to deny the motions that the complaints be dismissed for failure to state claims upon which relief could be granted.
Court membership
Case opinions
Plurality Burton, joined by Douglas
Concurrence Black
Concurrence Frankfurter
Concurrence Jackson
Dissent Reed, joined by Vinson, Minton
Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath, 341 U.S. 123 (1951), was a United States Supreme Court opinion revolving around the right of association.

Contents

  • Facts 1
  • Result 2
  • See also 3
  • Further reading 4
  • External links 5

Facts

The Francisco Franco during the Spanish Civil War and World War II. The district courts and appeals courts had ruled that the organizations could not sue because there was no specified way to redress their grievances in the case.

Result

Justice Hugo Black offered a concurring opinion in which he compared government blacklists to bills of attainder. He appended a passage from the footnotes of the historian Thomas Macaulay's History of England from the Accession of James the Second describing the evils of the great Act of Attainder enacted at the behest of James II.

See also

Further reading

External links

341 U.S. 123 (1951) Link to full text of case on Findlaw.com

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.