The
bandwidth,
\Delta f, or
f_{1} to
f_{2}, of a damped oscillator is shown on a graph of energy versus frequency. The Q factor of the damped oscillator, or filter, is
f_c/\Delta f. The higher the Q, the narrower and 'sharper' the peak is.
In physics and engineering the quality factor or Q factor is a dimensionless parameter that describes how underdamped an oscillator or resonator is,^{[1]} as well as characterizes a resonator's bandwidth relative to its center frequency.^{[2]} Higher Q indicates a lower rate of energy loss relative to the stored energy of the resonator; the oscillations die out more slowly. A pendulum suspended from a highquality bearing, oscillating in air, has a high Q, while a pendulum immersed in oil has a low one. Resonators with high quality factors have low damping so that they ring longer.
Contents

Explanation 1

Definition of the quality factor 2

Q factor and damping 3

Quality factors of common systems 3.1

Physical interpretation of Q 4

Electrical systems 5

Relationship between Q and Bandwidth 5.1

RLC circuits 5.2

Individual reactive components 5.3

Mechanical systems 6

Optical systems 7

See also 8

References 9

Further reading 10

External links 11
Explanation
Sinusoidally driven resonators having higher Q factors resonate with greater amplitudes (at the resonant frequency) but have a smaller range of frequencies around that frequency for which they resonate; the range of frequencies for which the oscillator resonates is called the bandwidth. Thus, a highQ tuned circuit in a radio receiver would be more difficult to tune, but would have more selectivity; it would do a better job of filtering out signals from other stations that lie nearby on the spectrum. HighQ oscillators oscillate with a smaller range of frequencies and are more stable. (See oscillator phase noise.)
The quality factor of oscillators varies substantially from system to system. Systems for which damping is important (such as dampers keeping a door from slamming shut) have Q near ½. Clocks, lasers, and other resonating systems that need either strong resonance or high frequency stability have high quality factors. Tuning forks have quality factors around 1000. The quality factor of atomic clocks, superconducting RF cavities used in accelerators, and some highQ lasers can reach as high as 10^{11}^{[3]} and higher.^{[4]}
There are many alternative quantities used by physicists and engineers to describe how damped an oscillator is. Important examples include: the damping ratio, relative bandwidth, linewidth and bandwidth measured in octaves.
The concept of "Q" originated with K.S. Johnson of Western Electric Company's Engineering Department while evaluating the quality of coils (inductors). His choice of the symbol Q was only because, at the time, all other letters of the alphabet were taken. The term was not intended as an abbreviation for "quality" or "quality factor", although these terms have grown to be associated with it.^{[5]}^{[6]}^{[7]}
Definition of the quality factor
In the context of resonators, there are two common definitions for Q, which aren't necessarily equivalent. They become approximately equivalent as Q becomes larger, meaning the resonator becomes less damped. One of these definitions is the frequencytobandwidth ratio of the resonator:

Q\ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\ \frac{f_r}{\Delta f} = \frac{\omega_r}{\Delta \omega}, \,
where f_{r} is the resonant frequency, Δf is the halfpower bandwidth i.e. the bandwidth over which the power of vibration is greater than half the power at the resonant frequency, ω_{r} = 2πf_{r} is the angular resonant frequency, and Δω is the angular halfpower bandwidth.
The other common definition for Q is the ratio of the energy stored in the oscillating resonator to the energy dissipated per cycle by damping processes:

Q\ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\ 2 \pi \times \frac{\text{Energy Stored}}{\text{Energy dissipated per cycle}} = 2 \pi f_r \times \frac{\text{Energy Stored}}{\text{Power Loss}}. \,
The factor 2π makes Q expressible in simpler terms, involving only the coefficients of the secondorder differential equation describing most resonant systems, electrical or mechanical. In electrical systems, the stored energy is the sum of energies stored in lossless inductors and capacitors; the lost energy is the sum of the energies dissipated in resistors per cycle. In mechanical systems, the stored energy is the maximum possible stored energy, or the total energy, i.e. the sum of the potential and kinetic energies at some point in time; the lost energy is the work done by an external conservative force, per cycle, to maintain amplitude.
More generally and in the context of reactive component specification (especially inductors), the frequencydependent definition of Q is used:^{[8]}

Q(\omega) = \omega \times \frac{\text{Maximum Energy Stored}}{\text{Power Loss}}, \,
where ω is the angular frequency at which the stored energy and power loss are measured. This definition is consistent with its usage in describing circuits with a single reactive element (capacitor or inductor), where it can be shown to be equal to the ratio of reactive power to real power. (See Individual reactive components.)
Q factor and damping
The Q factor determines the qualitative behavior of simple damped oscillators. (For mathematical details about these systems and their behavior see harmonic oscillator and linear time invariant (LTI) system.)

A system with low quality factor (Q < ½) is said to be overdamped. Such a system doesn't oscillate at all, but when displaced from its equilibrium steadystate output it returns to it by exponential decay, approaching the steady state value asymptotically. It has an impulse response that is the sum of two decaying exponential functions with different rates of decay. As the quality factor decreases the slower decay mode becomes stronger relative to the faster mode and dominates the system's response resulting in a slower system. A secondorder lowpass filter with a very low quality factor has a nearly firstorder step response; the system's output responds to a step input by slowly rising toward an asymptote.

A system with high quality factor (Q > ½) is said to be underdamped. Underdamped systems combine oscillation at a specific frequency with a decay of the amplitude of the signal. Underdamped systems with a low quality factor (a little above Q = ½) may oscillate only once or a few times before dying out. As the quality factor increases, the relative amount of damping decreases. A highquality bell rings with a single pure tone for a very long time after being struck. A purely oscillatory system, such as a bell that rings forever, has an infinite quality factor. More generally, the output of a secondorder lowpass filter with a very high quality factor responds to a step input by quickly rising above, oscillating around, and eventually converging to a steadystate value.

A system with an intermediate quality factor (Q = ½) is said to be critically damped. Like an overdamped system, the output does not oscillate, and does not overshoot its steadystate output (i.e., it approaches a steadystate asymptote). Like an underdamped response, the output of such a system responds quickly to a unit step input. Critical damping results in the fastest response (approach to the final value) possible without overshoot. Real system specifications usually allow some overshoot for a faster initial response or require a slower initial response to provide a safety margin against overshoot.
In negative feedback systems, the dominant closedloop response is often wellmodeled by a secondorder system. The phase margin of the openloop system sets the quality factor Q of the closedloop system; as the phase margin decreases, the approximate secondorder closedloop system is made more oscillatory (i.e., has a higher quality factor).
Quality factors of common systems

A unity gain Sallen–Key filter topology with equivalent capacitors and equivalent resistors is critically damped (i.e., Q = 1/2).

A second order Butterworth filter (i.e., continuoustime filter with the flattest passband frequency response) has an underdamped Q = 1/\sqrt{2}.^{[9]}

A Bessel filter (i.e., continuoustime filter with flattest group delay) has an underdamped Q = 1/\sqrt{3}.
Physical interpretation of Q
Physically speaking, Q is 2\pi times the ratio of the total energy stored divided by the energy lost in a single cycle or equivalently the ratio of the stored energy to the energy dissipated over one radian of the oscillation.^{[10]}
It is a dimensionless parameter that compares the exponential time constant τ for decay of an oscillating physical system's amplitude to its oscillation period. Equivalently, it compares the frequency at which a system oscillates to the rate at which it dissipates its energy.
Equivalently (for large values of Q), the Q factor is approximately the number of oscillations required for a freely oscillating system's energy to fall off to e^{2\pi}, or about 1/535 or 0.2%, of its original energy.^{[11]}
The width (bandwidth) of the resonance is given by

\Delta f = \frac{f_0}{Q} \, ,
where f_0 is the resonant frequency, and \Delta f, the bandwidth, is the width of the range of frequencies for which the energy is at least half its peak value.
The resonant frequency is often expressed in natural units (radians per second), rather than using the f_0 in hertz, as

\omega_0 = 2 \pi f_0.
The factors Q, damping ratio ζ, attenuation rate α, and exponential time constant τ are related such that:^{[12]}

Q = \frac{1}{2 \zeta} = { \omega_0 \over 2 \alpha } = { \tau \omega_0 \over 2 },
and the damping ratio can be expressed as:

\zeta = \frac{1}{2 Q} = { \alpha \over \omega_0 } = { 1 \over \tau \omega_0 }.
The envelope of oscillation decays proportional to e^{\alpha t} or e^{t / \tau}, where α and τ can be expressed as:

\alpha = { \omega_0 \over 2 Q } = \zeta \omega_0 = {1 \over \tau}
and

\tau = { 2 Q \over \omega_0 } = {1 \over \zeta \omega_0} = {1 \over \alpha} .
The energy of oscillation, or the power dissipation, decays twice as fast, that is, as the square of the amplitude, as e^{2\alpha t} or e^{2t / \tau}.
For a twopole lowpass filter, the transfer function of the filter is^{[12]}

H(s) = \frac{ \omega_0^2 }{ s^2 + \underbrace{ \frac{ \omega_0 }{Q} }_{2 \zeta \omega_0 = 2 \alpha }s + \omega_0^2 } \,
For this system, when Q > 0.5 (i.e., when the system is underdamped), it has two complex conjugate poles that each have a real part of \alpha. That is, the attenuation parameter \alpha represents the rate of exponential decay of the oscillations (that is, of the output after an impulse) into the system. A higher quality factor implies a lower attenuation rate, and so highQ systems oscillate for many cycles. For example, highquality bells have an approximately pure sinusoidal tone for a long time after being struck by a hammer.
Filter type (2nd order)

Transfer function^{[13]}

Lowpass

H(s) = \frac{ \omega_0^2 }{ s^2 + \frac{ \omega_0 }{Q}s + \omega_0^2 }

Bandpass

H(s) = \frac{ \frac{\omega_0}{Q}s}{ s^2 + \frac{ \omega_0 }{Q}s + \omega_0^2 }

Notch

H(s) = \frac{ s^2 + \omega_0^2}{ s^2 + \frac{ \omega_0 }{Q}s + \omega_0^2 }

Highpass

H(s) = \frac{ s^2 }{ s^2 + \frac{ \omega_0 }{Q}s + \omega_0^2 }


Electrical systems
A graph of a filter's gain magnitude, illustrating the concept of 3 dB at a voltage gain of 0.707 or halfpower bandwidth. The frequency axis of this symbolic diagram can be linear or
logarithmically scaled.
For an electrically resonant system, the Q factor represents the effect of electrical resistance and, for electromechanical resonators such as quartz crystals, mechanical friction.
Relationship between Q and Bandwidth
The 2sided bandwidth relative to a carrier frequency of F Hz is F/Q.
For example, an antenna tuned to have a Q value of 10 and a centre frequency of 100 kHz would have a 3 dB bandwidth of 10 kHz.
RLC circuits
In an ideal series RLC circuit, and in a tuned radio frequency receiver (TRF) the Q factor is:

Q = \frac{1}{R} \sqrt{\frac{L}{C}} = \frac{\omega_0 L}{R} ,
where R, L and C are the resistance, inductance and capacitance of the tuned circuit, respectively. The larger the series resistance, the lower the circuit Q.
For a parallel RLC circuit, the Q factor is the inverse of the series case:^{[14]}

Q = R \sqrt{\frac{C}{L}} = \frac{R}{\omega_0 L} = \omega_0 R C ^{[15]}
Consider a circuit where R, L and C are all in parallel. The lower the parallel resistance, the more effect it will have in damping the circuit and thus the lower the Q. This is useful in filter design to determine the bandwidth.
In a parallel LC circuit where the main loss is the resistance of the inductor, R, in series with the inductance, L, Q is as in the series circuit. This is a common circumstance for resonators, where limiting the resistance of the inductor to improve Q and narrow the bandwidth is the desired result.
Individual reactive components
The Q of an individual reactive component depends on the frequency at which it is evaluated, which is typically the resonant frequency of the circuit that it is used in. The Q of an inductor with a series loss resistance is the Q of a resonant circuit using that inductor (including its series loss) and a perfect capacitor.^{[16]}

Q_L = \frac{X_L}{R_L}=\frac{\omega_0 L}{R_L}
Where:

\omega_0 is the resonance frequency in radians per second,

L is the inductance,

X_L is the inductive reactance, and

R_L is the series resistance of the inductor.
The Q of a capacitor with a series loss resistance is the same as the Q of a resonant circuit using that capacitor with a perfect inductor:^{[16]}

Q_C = \frac{X_C}{R_C}=\frac{1}{\omega_0 C R_C}
Where:

\omega_0 is the resonance frequency in radians per second,

C is the capacitance,

X_C is the capacitive reactance, and

R_C is the series resistance of the capacitor.
In general, the Q of a resonator involving a series combination of a capacitor and an inductor can be determined from the Q values of the components, whether their losses come from series resistance or otherwise:^{[16]}

Q = \frac{1}{(1/Q_L + 1/Q_C)}
Mechanical systems
For a single damped massspring system, the Q factor represents the effect of simplified viscous damping or drag, where the damping force or drag force is proportional to velocity. The formula for the Q factor is:

Q = \frac{\sqrt{M k}}{D}, \,
where M is the mass, k is the spring constant, and D is the damping coefficient, defined by the equation F_{\text{damping}}=Dv, where v is the velocity.^{[17]}
Optical systems
In optics, the Q factor of a resonant cavity is given by

Q = \frac{2\pi f_o\,\mathcal{E}}{P}, \,
where f_o is the resonant frequency, \mathcal{E} is the stored energy in the cavity, and P=\frac{d\mathcal{E}}{dt} is the power dissipated. The optical Q is equal to the ratio of the resonant frequency to the bandwidth of the cavity resonance. The average lifetime of a resonant photon in the cavity is proportional to the cavity's Q. If the Q factor of a laser's cavity is abruptly changed from a low value to a high one, the laser will emit a pulse of light that is much more intense than the laser's normal continuous output. This technique is known as Qswitching.
See also
References

^ James H. Harlow (2004). Electric power transformer engineering. CRC Press. pp. 2–216.

^ Michael H. Tooley (2006). Electronic circuits: fundamentals and applications. Newnes. pp. 77–78.

^ Encyclopedia of Laser Physics and Technology:Q factor

^ Time and Frequency from A to Z: Q to Ra

^ http://www.collinsaudio.com/Prosound_Workshop/The_story_of_Q.pdf

^ B. Jeffreys, Q.Jl R. astr. Soc. (1985) 26, 5152

^ Paschotta, Rüdiger (2008). Encyclopedia of Laser Physics and Technology, Vol. 1: AM. WileyVCH. p. 580.

^ James W. Nilsson (1989). Electric Circuits.

^ http://opencourseware.kfupm.edu.sa/colleges/ces/ee/ee303/files%5C5Projects_Sample_Project3.pdf

^ Jackson, R. (2004). Novel Sensors and Sensing. Bristol: Institute of Physics Pub. p. 28.

^ Benjamin Crowell (2006). "Vibrations and Waves". Light and Matter online text series. , Ch.2

^ ^{a} ^{b} William McC. Siebert. Circuits, Signals, and Systems. MIT Press.

^ Chapter 8 – Analog Filters – Analog Devices

^ Series and Parallel Resonance

^ Frequency Response: Resonance, Bandwidth, Q Factor

^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} Franco Di Paolo (2000). Networks and Devices Using Planar Transmission Lines. CRC Press. pp. 490–491.

^ Methods of Experimental Physics – Lecture 5: Fourier Transforms and Differential Equations
Further reading
External links

Calculating the cutoff frequencies when center frequency and Q factor is given

Explanation of Q factor in radio tuning circuits
This article was sourced from Creative Commons AttributionShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, EGovernment Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a nonprofit organization.