World Library  

Add to Book Shelf
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Book

The Effect of Scale in Daily Precipitation Hazard Assessment : Volume 6, Issue 3 (06/06/2006)

By Egozcue, J. J.

Click here to view

Book Id: WPLBN0003985974
Format Type: PDF Article :
File Size: Pages 12
Reproduction Date: 2015

Title: The Effect of Scale in Daily Precipitation Hazard Assessment : Volume 6, Issue 3 (06/06/2006)  
Author: Egozcue, J. J.
Volume: Vol. 6, Issue 3
Language: English
Subject: Science, Natural, Hazards
Collections: Periodicals: Journal and Magazine Collection, Copernicus GmbH
Publication Date:
Publisher: Copernicus Gmbh, Göttingen, Germany
Member Page: Copernicus Publications


APA MLA Chicago

Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., Ortego, M. I., Tolosana-Delgado, R., & Egozcue, J. J. (2006). The Effect of Scale in Daily Precipitation Hazard Assessment : Volume 6, Issue 3 (06/06/2006). Retrieved from

Description: Dept. de Matemàtica Aplicada III, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain. Daily precipitation is recorded as the total amount of water collected by a rain-gauge in 24 h. Events are modelled as a Poisson process and the 24 h precipitation by a Generalised Pareto Distribution (GPD) of excesses. Hazard assessment is complete when estimates of the Poisson rate and the distribution parameters, together with a measure of their uncertainty, are obtained. The shape parameter of the GPD determines the support of the variable: Weibull domain of attraction (DA) corresponds to finite support variables as should be for natural phenomena. However, Fréchet DA has been reported for daily precipitation, which implies an infinite support and a heavy-tailed distribution. Bayesian techniques are used to estimate the parameters. The approach is illustrated with precipitation data from the Eastern coast of the Iberian Peninsula affected by severe convective precipitation. The estimated GPD is mainly in the Fréchet DA, something incompatible with the common sense assumption of that precipitation is a bounded phenomenon. The bounded character of precipitation is then taken as a priori hypothesis. Consistency of this hypothesis with the data is checked in two cases: using the raw-data (in mm) and using log-transformed data. As expected, a Bayesian model checking clearly rejects the model in the raw-data case. However, log-transformed data seem to be consistent with the model. This fact may be due to the adequacy of the log-scale to represent positive measurements for which differences are better relative than absolute.

The effect of scale in daily precipitation hazard assessment


Click To View

Additional Books

  • Landslide and Debris Flow Susceptibility... (by )
  • Assessment of Flash Floods Taking Into A... (by )
  • Comment on Rip Current Related Drowning ... (by )
  • Quantification of Basal Friction for Tec... (by )
  • Novelty Detection in Time Series of Ulf ... (by )
  • Landscape Analysis for Multi-hazard Prev... (by )
  • Risk Assessment Study of Fire Following ... (by )
  • Flood Risk Mitigation and Anthropogenic ... (by )
  • Gps Detection of Ionospheric Perturbatio... (by )
  • Investigating Rainfall Estimation from R... (by )
  • First Experience of Seismodeformation Mo... (by )
  • Comparison of Flow Resistance Relations ... (by )
Scroll Left
Scroll Right


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.